This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

In the Acknowledgments of the original article, there was an error regarding the last Grant No. 2042019kf020, which should be changed to Grant No. 2042019kf0206. Thus, the revised Acknowledgments should read as follows: This work is supported by National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, Grant 2015CB932601), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21503151 and 81602610), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 2042018kf0210 and 2042019kf0206). This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

We would like to recorrect the error in Figure 2A,B. It occurred unintentionally during the collection and combining of the XRD data. Thus, the alternate data were used mistakenly in the submitted manuscript. The recorrected Figure 2A,B is provided below. Also, the corresponding discussion about the XRD results needs to be modified. Thus, the appropriate descriptions have been modified in the following paragraph. In addition, we noticed mistakes in the figure caption and x-axis of Figure 2C,D also; now we have rewritten the mixed caption. Figure 2. XRD pattern of (A) pristine MoSe2 and Co-doped MoSe2, and (B) [email protected]2 nanocomposite. Raman spectra of (C) pristine MoSe2 and Co doped MoSe2, and (D) [email protected]2 nanocomposite. Furthermore, the XRD and Raman analyses were performed for all prepared samples (CoMoSe2, Co2MoSe2, Co3MoSe2, and Co4MoSe2) and the [email protected]2 nanocomposite. Figure 2A demonstrates the XRD pattern of pristine MoSe2 with diffraction peaks of (002), (004), (100), (103), (006), (105), (416), (110), (008), (112), and (114) at corresponding diffraction angles 13.56°, 27.65°, 31.50°, 37.97°, 42.00°, 45.17°, 47.40°, 56.14°, 56.93°, 58.05°, and 65.83°, respectively (JCPDS 29-0914).40 Meanwhile, the XRD pattern of CoMoSe2 shows a higher-intensity peak for the (002) plane at 11.38°, whereas the other diffraction peaks of CoMoSe2 show very poor intensity. The observed diffraction pattern of CoMoSe2 is perfectly matched to the thin layer of MoSe2 as reported in the previous literature.8 Besides, no additional peaks were observed for CoSe2. This strongly suggests that the Co dopant is effectively dilute and integrated into the atomic lattice of MoSe2, without any impurities. As compared to CoMoSe2, the XRD pattern of Co2MoSe2, Co3MoSe2, and Co4MoSe2 shows the gradually increasing number of diffraction peaks between 11.38° and 61.89° diffraction angles. It is strongly associated with the diffraction peaks of the bulk form of MoSe2 as reported in the previous literature.41 Thus, it strongly suggests that the higher concentration of Co doping induces the transformation of the layer structure to bulk form. Figure 2B shows the XRD pattern of [email protected]2 with higher intensity diffraction peaks for (002), (001), (004), (100), (103), (006), and (416), which are overlapping at the diffraction angle of 11.47°, 26.28°, 28.53°, 31.17°, 40.09°, and 47.80°, respectively. Herein, the presence of the (001) plane represents successful integration of GO nanosheets with the CoMoSe2 layer. This article has not yet been cited by other publications. Figure 2. XRD pattern of (A) pristine MoSe2 and Co-doped MoSe2, and (B) [email protected]2 nanocomposite. Raman spectra of (C) pristine MoSe2 and Co doped MoSe2, and (D) [email protected]2 nanocomposite.