We have discovered a labeling error in our recently published Article entitled “Twist Angle-Dependent Atomic Reconstruction and Moiré Patterns in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Heterostructures”. These corrections have no bearing on the general findings of the paper, but will be apparent to the expert reader who is carefully comparing the energy differences produced by our density functional theory

The incorrect image of the histology section was used for Figure 6E (HBPFPE-non of the spleen) in the original manuscript. The correct image has now been included and confirms again that there were no apparent histopathologic changes in all tissues examined, including the spleen. Figure 6. Ex vivo fluorescence, 19F NMR, and histological analysis. (A) Co-registered X-ray and fluorescence images and

We note two errors in our published paper and list the corrections below. The Gibbs (free) energy change (ΔGet or ΔG0) for the electron transfer from N,N-dimethylaniline (DMA) to quantum dot (QD) in hexadecane should be read as +6.21 eV instead of +2.24 eV throughout the article and Table of Contents. The error occurred because we took the diameter of DMA instead of its radius. All the other free energy

Since the original publication of our article, we have realized that there were the following mistakes: In paragraph 2 of page 3064, “rGO significantly decreased the frequency and amplitude of mEPSCs and increased their rise time” should be “rGO significantly decreased the frequency and amplitude of mEPSCs without affecting their rise time and decay time.” In the paragraph 2 of page 3070 “The rise

In the initially published version of this article, the Acknowledgments was incomplete. The correct Acknowledgments statement is given below. This work was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the National Science Foundation (CBET1604216 and CHE1807891). G.B.M.W. acknowledges a two year scholarship from LPDP (Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education) for pursuing a master’s degree in

It has come to our attention that we included the wrong image for the representative photos of nitrotyrosine signals of the tumors treated with [email protected] in Figure 6f. We mistakenly merged the unmatched image of DAPI-stained cells in the picture of nitrotyrosine signals of [email protected] The picture of nitrotyrosine signals of the tumors treated with [email protected] is corrected in Figure