In this article, we review an array of positions in the contemporary literature that concern the moral reasons for vegan consumerism. We situate veganism within the broader field of ethical consumerism, present a variety of motivations and justifications for veganism, and discuss criticisms of vegan consumerism. The arguments presented in the article ultimately pertain to the question of whether concerns

In Bataille (2020), an error was published on page 15, under Section 4.  There is very little literature for the in‐transition and developed world. The sentence was incorrect and should have read:  There is very little literature for the in‐transition and less‐developed world. The online version has been corrected. The author apologizes for this error.

In Chand et al. (2019), the errors were published on page 3, Figure 3, and Figure 5. The revised changes do not affect any discussions or conclusions in the original article. On page 3 of the article, the following statement was made: “Note, unlike Atlantic and North Pacific basins, there is no in situ data included in the intensity estimates for the Australian basin…” We recognise that even though

In Zumwald et al. (2020), an error was published on page 3, under Section 2. Furthermore, it has been noted that the assessment of the level of uncertainty itself can be subject to substantial uncertainty (for this second‐order uncertainty see Knüsel, Baumberger, Marius, Bresch, & Knutti, 2020; Parker, 2014; Steel, 2016). The reference citation should have read: … (for this second‐order uncertainty

Recent IPCC assessments highlight a key role for large‐scale carbon removal in meeting the objectives of the Paris Agreement. This focus on removal, also referred to as negative emissions, is suggestive of novel opportunities, risks, and challenges in addressing climate change, but tends to build on the narrow techno‐economic framings that characterize integrated assessment modeling. While the discussion

Following a previous 2014 review of perceived personal experience of climate change, the authors review relevant research published or reported between January 2014 and mid‐year 2019. The review findings suggest that the nature, significance, and influence of perceived personal experience of natural environment changes, conditions, and events deemed to be likely consequences of global climate change

In a context of climate emergency and calls from the IPCC for “transformative systemic change,” we need to revisit the role of business in helping to accelerate responses to climate crisis. The scale and depth of the challenges facing business have intensified in ways which force us to refocus our research on questions of urgency and speed, as well as the growing need for new and alternative business

1 INTRODUCTION Crisis, by its very nature, requires decisive intervention. However, important questions can be obscured by the very immediacy of the crisis condition. What is the nature of the crisis? How it is defined (and by whom)? And, subsequently, what forms of knowledge are deemed legitimate and authoritative for informing interventions? As we see in the current pandemic, there is a desire for