Peer review underpins the integrity of the scientific archive and has done so for over 350 years. Over the past ten years or so, this integrity has come under pressure due to the introduction of predatory publishers and journals. Papers in predatory journals have, typically, not gone through robust peer review, if any at all. If these papers enter the scientific archive, its integrity will deteriorate. Moreover, legitimate journals will cite papers from predatory journals, which further dilutes the integrity of the scientific archive. The scholarly community has struggled to address the problems brought about by predatory publishers and journals. In this paper, we propose an approach, which draws on the fine art world. They use the concept of a catalogue raisonné to list all the validated work by a given artist and, by extension, identify fakes. A scholarly version will have some differences to the art discipline, but the central idea is the same. A publisher is analyzed, through a peer reviewed paper. This catalogue can be used by authors, and other stakeholders (e.g. librarians, promotion panels and hiring committees), to make more informed decisions.

同行评审支持科学档案的完整性，并且已经这样做了 350 多年。在过去十年左右的时间里，由于掠夺性出版商和期刊的引入，这种完整性受到了压力。掠夺性期刊上的论文通常没有经过严格的同行评审，如果有的话。如果这些论文进入科学档案，其完整性将会恶化。此外，合法期刊会引用掠夺性期刊的论文，这进一步削弱了科学档案的完整性。学术界一直在努力解决掠夺性出版商和期刊带来的问题。在本文中，我们提出了一种借鉴美术界的方法。他们使用全目录的概念来列出给定艺术家的所有经过验证的作品，并通过扩展识别赝品。学术版本与艺术学科会有一些差异，但中心思想是相同的。通过同行评审的论文对出版商进行分析。作者和其他利益相关者（例如图书馆员、推广小组和招聘委员会）可以使用该目录来做出更明智的决定。