AbstractThe present study attempts to analyze the interventions of Speakers of Polish and British Parliaments in the selected exchanges from 2018 to 2019 in terms of discourse-sensitive politeness theory advanced by Jonathan Culpeper. He proposes to use three types of impoliteness that affect three types of interlocutors’ faces via a range of impoliteness strategies. In the analyses we consider the linguistic, personal, and cultural as well as political context of the exchanges against the background of the unique, historically rooted institutional circumstances, with a special emphasis on the role of different physical contexts of respective Parliamentary chambers. We emphasize the discursive nature and continuum of (im)polite/(in)appropriate behaviors. In conclusion, the study falls back on Brown and Levinson’s tradition, argued not to be incompatible with Culpeper’s system, and confirms the existence of largely negative and largely positive politeness cultures, emphasizing the prevalence of Polish formal, impersonal, sometimes also affective impoliteness in contrast to the British somewhat more person-oriented, coercive impoliteness.

中文翻译：

---

基于礼貌理论的波兰和英国议会议长的干预

摘要本研究试图从 Jonathan Culpeper 提出的话语敏感礼貌理论的角度分析 2018 年至 2019 年波兰和英国议会议长在选定的交流中的干预。他建议使用三种类型的不礼貌，通过一系列不礼貌策略影响三种类型的对话者的脸。在分析中，我们在独特的、具有历史根源的制度环境的背景下考虑了交流的语言、个人、文化和政治背景，特别强调了各个议会会议厅不同物理背景的作用。我们强调（不）礼貌/（不）适当行为的话语性质和连续性。总之，这项研究回到了布朗和莱文森的传统，