Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton January 18, 2021

Interventions of Speakers of Polish and British Parliaments in the light of politeness theory

  • Dorota Brzozowska

    Dorota Brzozowska is Professor of Linguistics in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Opole, Poland. Her academic interests include humor studies, intercultural communication, discourse, and Asian studies. She is the author of three monographic studies: on comparison between Polish and English jokes, on Polish ethnic humor, and Chinese traces in contemporary Polish discourse (in Polish). She is the co-editor of Humorous Discourse, Culture’s Software: Communication Styles, and The European Journal of Humour Research.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    and Władysław Chłopicki

    Władysław Chłopicki holds a post-doctoral degree in linguistics. He is Senior Lecturer in the Department of English Studies at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland. His academic interests include interdisciplinary humor research in the context of cultural studies, cognitive linguistics, and linguistic pragmatics, with a special focus on communication styles. Author of a Polish language monographic study on humor research and editor of the publication series Humour and Culture, he is also co-editor of The European Journal of Humour Research.

    ORCID logo
From the journal Intercultural Pragmatics

Abstract

The present study attempts to analyze the interventions of Speakers of Polish and British Parliaments in the selected exchanges from 2018 to 2019 in terms of discourse-sensitive politeness theory advanced by Jonathan Culpeper. He proposes to use three types of impoliteness that affect three types of interlocutors’ faces via a range of impoliteness strategies. In the analyses we consider the linguistic, personal, and cultural as well as political context of the exchanges against the background of the unique, historically rooted institutional circumstances, with a special emphasis on the role of different physical contexts of respective Parliamentary chambers. We emphasize the discursive nature and continuum of (im)polite/(in)appropriate behaviors. In conclusion, the study falls back on Brown and Levinson’s tradition, argued not to be incompatible with Culpeper’s system, and confirms the existence of largely negative and largely positive politeness cultures, emphasizing the prevalence of Polish formal, impersonal, sometimes also affective impoliteness in contrast to the British somewhat more person-oriented, coercive impoliteness.


Corresponding author: Dorota Brzozowska, University of Opole, Opole, Poland, E-mail:

About the authors

Dorota Brzozowska

Dorota Brzozowska is Professor of Linguistics in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Opole, Poland. Her academic interests include humor studies, intercultural communication, discourse, and Asian studies. She is the author of three monographic studies: on comparison between Polish and English jokes, on Polish ethnic humor, and Chinese traces in contemporary Polish discourse (in Polish). She is the co-editor of Humorous Discourse, Culture’s Software: Communication Styles, and The European Journal of Humour Research.

Władysław Chłopicki

Władysław Chłopicki holds a post-doctoral degree in linguistics. He is Senior Lecturer in the Department of English Studies at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland. His academic interests include interdisciplinary humor research in the context of cultural studies, cognitive linguistics, and linguistic pragmatics, with a special focus on communication styles. Author of a Polish language monographic study on humor research and editor of the publication series Humour and Culture, he is also co-editor of The European Journal of Humour Research.

References

Bax, Marcel & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2012. Understanding historical (Im)politeness. Relational linguistic practice over time and across cultures. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.41Search in Google Scholar

Bayley, Paul (ed.). 2004. Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.10Search in Google Scholar

Bercow, John. 2020. Unspeakable: The autobiography. London: W&N.Search in Google Scholar

Bíba, Jan & Milan Znoj (eds.). 2017. A crisis of democracy and representation. Filosofický časopis / Journal of Philosophy, Special Issue 2017/1.Search in Google Scholar

Bogdanowska-Jakubowska, Ewa. 2010. Face. An interdisciplinary perspective. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3). 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2010. Historical (Im)politeness. Bern, Berlin: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0025-9Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan & Marina Terkourafi. 2017. Pragmatic approaches to (Im)politeness. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (Im)politeness, 11–40. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_2Search in Google Scholar

Domenici, Kathy & Stephen W. Littlejohn. 2006. Facework: Bridging theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.10.4135/9781452204222Search in Google Scholar

Ferenčík, Milan. 2010. Doing (Im)politeness in the media. Prešov: FF PU.Search in Google Scholar

García-Gómez, Antonio. 2020. Intercultural and interpersonal communication failures: Analyzing hostile interactions among British and Spanish university students on WhatsApp. Intercultural Pragmatics 17(1). 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-0002.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Ervin. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2013. Disentangling face, facework and im/politeness. Sociocultural Pragmatics 1(1). 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/soprag-2012-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2017. Intercultural (Im)politeness. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (Im)politeness, 601–632. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_23Search in Google Scholar

Hickey, Leo & Miranda Stewart (eds.). 2005. Politeness in Europe. Clevendo-Buffalo-Toronto: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853597398Search in Google Scholar

Geert Hofstede, Gert Jan Hofstede & Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.Search in Google Scholar

Huszcza, Romuald. 2005. Politeness in Poland: From ‘Titlemania’ to Grammaticalised Honorifics. In Leo Hickey & Miranda Stewart (eds.), Politeness in Europe, 218–233. Clevendo-Buffalo-Toronto: Multilingual Matters 2005.10.21832/9781853597398-017Search in Google Scholar

Ilie, Cornelia. 2004. Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments: A rhetorical approach. In Bayley Paul (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse, 45–86. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.10.02iliSearch in Google Scholar

Ilie, Cornelia (ed.). 2010. European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.38Search in Google Scholar

Ilie, Cornelia. 2001. Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of confrontation. In René Dirven, Roslyn M. Frank & Cornelia Ilie (eds.), Language and ideology. Volume 2: descriptive cognitive approaches, [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 205], 235–263. msterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins (accessed 14 June 2019).10.1075/cilt.205.14iliSearch in Google Scholar

Ilie, Cornelia & Ornatowski Cezary. 2016. Central and Eastern European parliamentary rhetoric since the nineteenth century: The case of Romania and Poland. In Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie & Kari Palonen (eds.), Parliament and parliamentarism: A comparative history of disputes about a European concept, 192–215. Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.10.2307/j.ctvgs0b7n.17Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel Z. & Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139382717Search in Google Scholar

Karwat, Mirosław. 2007. O złośliwej dyskredytacji. Manipulowanie wizerunkiem przeciwnika. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Kaul de Marlangeon, Silvia. 2008. Impoliteness in institutional and non-institutional contexts. Pragmatics 18(4). 735–49.10.1075/prag.18.4.08kauSearch in Google Scholar

Laskowska, Elżbieta. 2004. Dyskurs parlamentarny w ujęciu komunikacyjnym. Bydgoszcz: Akademia Bydgoska.Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110926552Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9.Search in Google Scholar

Majkowska, Aneta. 2012. Debata sejmowa jako gatunek wypowiedzi. Opole: WCM.Search in Google Scholar

Marcjanik, Małgorzata. 2007. Grzeczność w komunikacji językowej. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Márquez Reiter, Rosina. 2000. Linguistic politeness in britain and uruguay. A comparative study of requests and apologies. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.83Search in Google Scholar

Merkin, Rebecca S. 2017. Saving face in business: Managing cross-cultural interactions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Ogiermann, Eva. 2012. About Polish politeness. Linguistic insights. Studies in Language and Communication 132. 27–52.Search in Google Scholar

Ornatowski, Cezary. 2010. Parliamentary discourse and political transition: Polish parliament after 1989. In Cornelia Ilie (ed.), European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, 223–264. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.38.12ornSearch in Google Scholar

Robles, Jessica Sarah. 2011. Doing disagreement in the House of Lords: ‘Talking around the issue’ as a context-appropriate argumentative strategy. Discourse & Communication 5(2). 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310395452.Search in Google Scholar

Sowa, Agnieszka. 2016. Kuchciński, Terlecki: Od hipisów do PiS-u . Polityka 26.01.2016 https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/kraj/1648306,1,kuchcinski-terlecki-od-hipisow-do-pis-u.read (Accessed 26 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 529−545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-XSearch in Google Scholar

Stewart, Miranda. 2005. Politeness in Britain: ‘It’s only a suggestion. In Leo Hickey & Miranda Stewart (eds.), 2005. Politeness in Europe, 116–129. Clevendo-Buffalo-Toronto: Multilingual MattersIn.10.21832/9781853597398-010Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charlotte. 2016. Mock politeness and culture: Perceptions and practice in UK and Italian data 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2016-0021.Search in Google Scholar

Ting-Toomey, Stella & Atsuko Kurogi. 1998. Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22. 187–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2.Search in Google Scholar

Whale, Sebastian. 2020. John Bercow: Call to order. Hull: Biteback.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615184Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1999. In Jerzy Bartmiński (ed.), Język – umysł - kultura. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth & Thun A. van Dijk (eds.). (2000). Racism at the top: Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-01-18
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2021-0004/html
Scroll to top button