Time for the European Court of Human Rights to interpret Article 6 ECHR to encompasses a subjective right for domestic judges to their own independence – Overview of the existing case law on the principle of judicial independence – Such a right currently not present in case law – Judges are obliged to frame their complaints, while at their heart independence-related, in terms of other substantive Convention rights – Court cannot properly address one of the fundamental aspects of these cases – Lower protection for the domestic judges – Other international legal orders do include such a subjective right to a judge’s independence – Several arguments for the European Court of Human Rights to similarly acknowledge such a right under the Convention – Few difficulties in integrating such a right into the existing case law

中文翻译：

---

谁来保护监护人？《欧洲人权公约》第 6 条第 1 款规定的法官独立的主观权利

欧洲人权法院是时候将《欧洲人权公约》第 6 条解释为包含国内法官自身独立的主观权利——关于司法独立原则的现有判例法概述——这种权利目前在判例法中不存在——法官就其他实质性公约权利而言，虽然本质上与独立性相关，但他们有义务提出申诉 – 法院无法妥善处理这些案件的基本方面之一 – 对国内法官的保护较低 – 其他国际法律命令确实包括此类法官独立的主观权利——欧洲人权法院根据《公约》同样承认这种权利的几个论据——将这种权利纳入现有判例法几乎没有困难