I will present a comparative analysis between Thomas Kuhn's The Copernican Revolution (CR) published in 1957 and The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (SSR) published in 1962, ir order to identify divergences in the views contained in each work. I shall set forth a comparative analysis of the historiographical assumptions employed by Kuhn in each of his books. I will explore some proposals which have pointed out several discontinuities between both books, as I introduce some tools to widen this interpretative trend. I will argue that although Kuhn’s work in 1957 contains some concerns and problems which anticipate his later stances, these anticipations coexist with historiographical formulations and premises which are incompatible with the core of SSR. Therefore, I will assert that Kuhn adopts different historiographical frameworks in CR and in SSR. Finally, I will conclude that these differences are expressions of Kuhn's adoption of a more externalist view in the former, and a more internalist frame in the latter.

我将介绍托马斯库恩1957 年出版的哥白尼革命(CR) 与科学革命的结构之间的比较分析(SSR) 于 1962 年出版，目的是找出每部作品中包含的观点的分歧。我将对库恩在他的每本书中采用的史学假设进行比较分析。当我介绍一些工具来扩大这种解释趋势时，我将探讨一些指出两本书之间存在一些不连续性的建议。我会争辩说，尽管库恩 1957 年的工作包含一些预料到他后来的立场的担忧和问题，但这些预期与与 SSR 核心不相容的史学表述和前提共存。因此，我将断言库恩在 CR 和 SSR 中采用了不同的史学框架。最后，我将得出结论，这些差异是库恩在前者中采用更外在主义观点的表达，