当前位置: X-MOL 学术Husserl Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Theodor Conrad, Zum Gedächtnis Edmund Husserls (Ein unveröffentlichter Aufsatz aus der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek)
Husserl Studies Pub Date : 2021-05-27 , DOI: 10.1007/s10743-021-09289-8
Daniele De Santis

The present essay, here published for the first time, is part of a group of four texts on the history of the early phenomenological movement that Theodor Conrad wrote right after World War II. One of these texts known as “Conrads Bericht” was edited by Eberhard Avé-Lallemant and Karl Schuhmann and published in Husserl Studies in 1992. The four original typescripts are preserved in the archive of the Munich Circle of phenomenology at the Bavarian State Library. As the reader will immediately realize, at the center of the present text is a peculiar account of the beginning of the phenomenological tradition, namely, of its first schism. Contrary to the usual thesis according to which the first schism revolved mainly, if not exclusively around the so-called “idealism-realism controversy,” Conrad points out that this was only part of it, and that the first controversy between Husserl and some of his early disciples or students bore on the nature of phenomenology itself.



中文翻译:

西奥多·康拉德(Theodor Conrad),祖姆·加德赫特尼斯(ZumGedächtnis)埃德蒙·胡塞尔斯(Edmund Husserls)

本文是首次出版,是第二次世界大战后西奥多·康拉德(Theodor Conrad)撰写的有关早期现象学运动历史的四组文本的一部分。这些被称为“ Conrads Bericht”的文本之一由EberhardAvé-Lallemant和Karl Schuhmann编辑,并发表在《胡塞尔研究》上1992年。四种原始打字稿保存在巴伐利亚州立图书馆的慕尼黑现象学界档案中。正如读者将立即意识到的那样,本文的中心是对现象学传统的开始(即它的第一次分裂)的特殊描述。与通常的论点相反,康拉德指出,第一次分裂主要是围绕着“理想主义-现实主义之争”,而不是仅仅围绕着“理想主义-现实主义之争”。他的早期门徒或学生对现象学本身的性质感到厌烦。

更新日期:2021-05-27
down
wechat
bug