The article explores the agreements and disagreements between the author and the authors of Responsible Brains on how neuroscience relates to moral responsibility. The agreements are fundamental: neuroscience is not the harbinger of revolutionary revision of our views of when persons are morally responsible for the harms that they cause. The disagreements are in the details of what is needed for neuroscience to be the helper (rather than the challeger) of the moral sciences.

中文翻译：

---

将神经科学与责任联系起来：评论Hirstein，Sifferd和Fagan的负责任的大脑

本文探讨了作者与“负责任的大脑”作者之间关于神经科学如何与道德责任相关的共识和分歧。这些协议是根本的：神经科学不是革命性地修订我们的观点的先驱，即人们何时对他们所造成的伤害负有道德责任。分歧在于神经科学成为道德科学的帮助者（而不是挑战者）所需要的细节。