Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relating Neuroscience to Responsibility: Comments on Hirstein, Sifferd, and Fagan’s Responsible Brains

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Criminal Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article explores the agreements and disagreements between the author and the authors of Responsible Brains on how neuroscience relates to moral responsibility. The agreements are fundamental: neuroscience is not the harbinger of revolutionary revision of our views of when persons are morally responsible for the harms that they cause. The disagreements are in the details of what is needed for neuroscience to be the helper (rather than the challeger) of the moral sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. William Hirstein, Katrina L. Sifferd, and Tyler K. Fagan, Responsible Brains: Neuroscience, Law, and Human Culpability (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2018). Parenthetical page references in the text are to this book.

References

  • Andreasen, Nancy, 1984. The Broken Brain (New York: Harper and Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald, 1973. “Freedom to Act,” in Ted Honderich, ed., Essays on Freedom of Action (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel, 1969. Contents and Consciousness (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, John, 1994. How the Self Controls Its Brain (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry, 1969. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,” Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 66: pp. 829-839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry, 1971. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,” Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 68: pp. 5-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry, 1984. “Identification and Wholeheartedness,” in Ferdinand Shoeman, ed., Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin, 1970. A Theory of Human Action (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, Todd, and Colin Camerer and Antonio Rangel, 2009. “Self-Control in Decision-Making Involves Modulation of the vmPFC Valuation System,” Science, Vol. 324: pp. 646-648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Heidi and Michael Moore, 2011. “Punishing the Awkward, the Stupid, the Weak, and the Selfish: The Culpability of Negligence,” Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol. 5: pp. 147-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, John, 2014. “Abilities,” in Edward N. Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

  • McKenna, Michael and Justin Coates, 2019. “Compatibilism,” in Edward N. Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

  • Molnar, George, 2003. Powers: A Study Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, George Edward, 1912. Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael, 1980. “Responsibility and the Unconscious,” Southern California Law Review, Vol. 53: pp. 1563-1675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael, 1983. “The Unity of Self,” in Michael Ruse, ed., Nature Animated: Western Ontario Series in the Philosophy of Science (The Netherlands: D. Reidel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael, 1984. Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael, 1988. “Mind, Brain, and the Unconscious,” in Peter Clarke and Crispin Wight, eds., Mind, Psychoanalysis, and Science (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael, 1990. “Choice, Character, and Excuse,” Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 7: pp. 219-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael, 2020. Mechanical Choices; The Responsibility of the Human Machine (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, Stephen, 2011. Getting Causes from Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, Adina, 2012. “Don’t Panic: Self-Authorship Without Obscure Metaphysics,” Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 26: pp. 23-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael, 2004. “Rational Capacities,” in Smith, Ethics and the A Priori (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, Peter F., 1962. “Freedom and Resentment,” Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 48: pp. 1-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, Manuel, 2005. “The Trouble with Tracing,” in Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 29: pp. 269-290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vihvelin, Kadri, 2013. Causes, Laws, and Free Will: Why Determinism Doesn’t Matter (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Gary, 1975. “Free Agency,” Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 72: pp. 205-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Moore.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, M.S. Relating Neuroscience to Responsibility: Comments on Hirstein, Sifferd, and Fagan’s Responsible Brains. Criminal Law, Philosophy 16, 283–298 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09573-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09573-w

Keywords

Navigation