We have kindly received the comments by Hamdache and Pelàez on our published paper (Hamidatou et al. 2019 ); This article will give us the opportunity to provide more explanation and clarifications on the methodology followed during our work. We find these comments and critiques helpful for our future works. However, most of them were generated from the misapprehension of the paper by the comment authors. These remarks were mainly based on (1) the misjudging of the seismic source zone model used in relation to the active faults in the study area, (2) suspecting that the probabilistic seismic hazard PGA values were wrongly quoted from their analyses in our work, and (3) the logic tree usage , for which we here provide further general clarifications.

中文翻译：

---

回复 Mohamed Hamdache 和 José A. Pelàez 对论文“Seismic Hazard Analysis of Surface Level, Using Topographic Condition in Algeria of Algeria”的评论

我们收到了 Hamdache 和 Pelàez 对我们已发表论文的评论（Hamidatou et al. 2019）；这篇文章将使我们有机会对我们工作中遵循的方法提供更多的解释和说明。我们发现这些评论和批评对我们未来的工作很有帮助。然而，其中大部分是由于评论作者对论文的误解而产生的。这些评论主要基于（1）对研究区活动断层所使用的震源区模型的错误判断，（2）怀疑在我们的工作中从他们的分析中错误地引用了概率地震危险性PGA值， (3) 逻辑树用法，我们在这里提供进一步的一般说明。