当前位置: X-MOL 学术Brain Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of Three Physical—Cognitive Training Programs in Healthy Older Adults: A Study Protocol for a Monocentric Randomized Trial
Brain Sciences ( IF 2.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-06 , DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010066
Marta Maria Torre , Antoine Langeard , Nicolas Hugues , Jérôme Laurin , Jean-Jacques Temprado

(1) Combining aerobic, coordination and cognitive training allows for more improved physical and cognitive performance than when performed separately. A Nordic walking (NW) and two cognitive-motor circuit training programs (CT-c and CT-fit) are compared. CT-c and CT-fit stimulate cognition differently: CT-c, is through conventional complex coordination training performed in single and dual-task conditions; CT-fit, incorporates it into complex goal-directed actions, implemented by fitness gaming technology (2) The aim is to determine whether CT-fit brings additional benefits to cognition compared to more traditional training. (3) Forty-five healthy independent living community dwellers participants (65–80 years) will be included after a general medical examination. The main exclusion criteria are signs of cognitive impairments (Mini–Mental State Examination < 26/30) and physical impairments. Pre and post-tests will be performed to assess: cognitive functions (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Trail Making Test; Stroop task, working memory test, Rey Complex Figure copy task, Oral Trail Making Test, and dual-task); motor fitness (Bipedal and unipedal balance test, gait assessments, Time Up and Go, chair sit and reach test and four-square stepping test); and physical fitness (10 m incremental shuttle walking test, maximal handgrip force, Timed-Stands test). (4) Incorporating cognitive demands into complex, goal-directed actions using fitness gaming technology should be the best solution to optimize training benefits.

中文翻译:

健康成年人中三种身体认知训练计划的比较:单中心随机试验的研究方案

(1)有氧,协调和认知训练相结合,比单独进行健身和认知表现更好。比较了北欧行走(NW)和两个认知运动回路训练程序(CT-c和CT-fit)。CT-c和CT-fit刺激认知的方式有所不同:CT-c是通过在单任务和双任务条件下进行的常规复杂协调训练进行的;CT-fit将其纳入由健身游戏技术实施的复杂的目标导向动作中(2)的目的是确定与传统训练相比,CT-fit是否给认知带来了更多好处。(3)在接受一般体格检查后,将包括45名健康独立生活社区居民(65-80岁)。主要的排除标准是认知障碍的迹象(最小精神状态检查<26/30)和身体障碍。进行预测试和后测试以评估:认知功能(蒙特利尔认知评估;跟踪制作测试; Stroop任务,工作记忆测试,Rey Complex Figure复制任务,口头跟踪制作测试和双重任务);以及 运动适应性(双足和单足平衡测试,步态评估,Time Up and Go,坐和伸手测试和四平方踩踏测试);和身体适应性(10 m增量往复行走测试,最大握力,定时站立测试)。(4)使用健身游戏技术将认知需求整合到复杂的,目标导向的行为中,应该是优化培训收益的最佳解决方案。认知功能(蒙特利尔认知评估;线索制作测试; Stroop任务,工作记忆测试,Rey Complex Figure复制任务,口头线索制作测试和双重任务);运动适应性(双足和单足平衡测试,步态评估,Time Up and Go,坐和伸手测试和四平方踩踏测试);和身体适应性(10 m增量穿梭步行测试,最大握力,定时站立测试)。(4)使用健身游戏技术将认知需求整合到复杂的,目标导向的行为中,应该是优化培训收益的最佳解决方案。认知功能(蒙特利尔认知评估;线索制作测试; Stroop任务,工作记忆测试,Rey Complex Figure复制任务,口头线索制作测试和双重任务);运动适应性(双足和单足平衡测试,步态评估,Time Up and Go,坐和伸手测试和四平方踩踏测试);和身体适应性(10 m增量穿梭步行测试,最大握力,定时站立测试)。(4)使用健身游戏技术将认知需求整合到复杂的,目标导向的行为中,应该是优化培训收益的最佳解决方案。椅子坐着力测试和四平方踩踏测试);和身体适应性(10 m增量穿梭步行测试,最大握力,定时站立测试)。(4)使用健身游戏技术将认知需求整合到复杂的,目标导向的行为中,应该是优化培训收益的最佳解决方案。椅子坐着力测试和四平方踩踏测试);和身体适应性(10 m增量往复行走测试,最大握力,定时站立测试)。(4)使用健身游戏技术将认知需求整合到复杂的,目标导向的行为中,应该是优化培训收益的最佳解决方案。
更新日期:2021-01-06
down
wechat
bug