Research has shown that while traditional (e.g., physical and relational) and cyber aggression and victimization often co-occur, individuals may differ in terms of their experiences with aggression and victimization as well as social-psychological adjustment. The current study investigated whether there are distinct groups of college students who experience different forms of aggression and victimization using latent profile analysis (LPA), and whether these groups differ from one another in their maladaptive personality characteristics and psychopathology symptoms. Participants were 540 undergraduate students from a Midwestern university (53% female; 78.5% White; average age = 19.27 years). Four profiles were identified: Non-Involved (80.7%), Traditional Victim-Only (10.3%), Traditional Aggressor/Victim (4.8%), and Combined Aggressor/Victim (traditional aggression, cyber aggression and victimization; 4.1%). Maladaptive personality traits and psychopathology symptoms differed across the four groups. Both the traditional aggressor/victim group and the combined aggressor/victim group, compared to the non-involved and traditional victim-only group, reported higher levels of narcissism, psychopathy, and callous-unemotional (CU) traits. The traditional aggressor/victim group, compared to the combined aggressor/victim group, reported higher levels of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and CU traits. The combined aggressor/victim group reported higher levels of psychopathology symptoms (i.e., emotion dysregulation, depression, anxiety, and stress) compared to the traditional aggressor/victim group. These findings enhance our understanding of the heterogeneity in experiences with aggression and victimization among college students, and highlight the importance of developing interventions that target their specific mental health needs.

研究表明，虽然经常同时发生传统的（例如身体上和关系上的）和网络侵略和受害，但是个人在侵略和受害以及社会心理适应方面的经历可能有所不同。本研究使用潜在特征分析（LPA）调查是否存在不同的大学生群体，他们经历了不同形式的侵略和受害，并且这些群体在适应不良的人格特征和心理病理学症状方面是否彼此不同。参与者是来自中西部大学的540名本科生（女性53％；白人78.5％；平均年龄= 19.27岁）。确定了四个特征：不参与（80.7％），仅传统受害者（10.3％），传统侵略者/受害者（4.8％），侵略者/受害者联合（传统侵略，网络侵略和受害； 4.1％）。在四组中，适应不良的人格特征和心理病理学症状有所不同。传统的侵略者/受害者组和联合的侵略者/受害者组与非参与和传统的仅受害者组相比，都报告了更高水平的自恋，精神病和无情-性欲（CU）特征。与侵略者/受害者的组合相比，传统侵略者/受害者的组报告了更高水平的自恋，马基雅维利主义，精神病和CU特征。与传统的侵略者/受害者组相比，侵略者/受害者联合组报告了更高水平的精神病理症状（即情绪失调，抑郁，焦虑和压力）。