当前位置: X-MOL 学术Atten. Percept. Psychophys. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Confusion within feedback control between cognitive and sensorimotor agency cues in self-other attribution.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-15 , DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02129-5
Yu Miyawaki 1, 2, 3 , Shu Morioka 1, 4
Affiliation  

Self-other sensory attribution is necessary to realize feedback control because the self-attribution of sensations can drive feedback control. Some studies have suggested that self-other attribution is realized by the integration of both sensorimotor cues, including internal prediction and/or sensory feedback, and cognitive cues, such as knowledge or thought. However, in motor control, it remains unclear whether and how cognitive cues affect self-other attribution. In a feedback-control task, this study manipulated the movements (sensorimotor cue) and appearances (cognitive cue) of the cursor provided as visual feedback on participants’ sinusoidal movement. Participants were required to make a self-other attribution regarding whether the cursor’s movement reflected their actual movement without being confused by the cursor’s appearance. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that participants made illusory self-other attributions within feedback control based on cursor appearance only when the information on cursor movement was reduced by causing the cursor to flicker at 8 Hz. However, in Experiment 3, in which the cursor flickering at 4 Hz reduced the information on cursor movement to a level too low for conscious self-other attribution, cursor appearance was not utilized. Our findings suggest that the effects of cognitive cues on self-other attribution are determined by the cue integration strategy selected for the given situation.



中文翻译:

自我和其他归因的认知和感觉运动代理线索之间的反馈控制混乱。

自我的其他感官归因是实现反馈控制所必需的,因为感觉的自我归因可以驱动反馈控制。一些研究表明,通过将包括内部预测和/或感觉反馈在内的感觉运动线索与诸如知识或思想之类的认知线索结合起来,可以实现自我他人的归因。然而,在运动控制中,尚不清楚认知线索是否以及如何影响自我其他归因。在一项反馈控制任务中,本研究操纵了光标的运动(感觉运动提示)和外观(认知提示),作为对参与者正弦运动的视觉反馈。要求参与者对光标的移动是否反映了他们的实际移动做出自己的归因,而不会被光标的外观所迷惑。实验1和2表明,仅当通过使光标以8 Hz的频率闪烁而减少光标移动的信息时,参与者才基于光标外观在反馈控制中做出虚假的自其他属性。但是,在实验3中,当光标以4 Hz的频率闪烁时,将光标移动的信息降低到对于有意识的自其他归因而言太低的水平,则没有利用光标的外观。我们的发现表明,认知线索对自我他人归因的影响取决于为特定情况选择的线索整合策略。其中,光标以4 Hz的频率闪烁将光标移动的信息降低到对于有意识的自其他归因而言太低的水平,因此没有利用光标的外观。我们的发现表明,认知线索对他人自我归因的影响取决于为特定情况选择的线索整合策略。其中,光标以4 Hz的频率闪烁将光标移动的信息降低到对于有意识的自其他归因而言太低的水平,因此没有利用光标的外观。我们的发现表明,认知线索对他人自我归因的影响取决于为特定情况选择的线索整合策略。

更新日期:2020-09-16
down
wechat
bug