There have been many practical programs suggested for building resilient cities and communities, many of which have been driven by governments to focus on disaster prevention rather than focusing on the needs of the affected population. The rebuilding resilient homeland (RRH) program discussed in this paper was a post-Lushan earthquake reconstruction, NGO-led, people-oriented experimental program. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to determine the methods used by the NGOs to lead the reconstruction program for “building back better” and identify the role that NGOs can play in state–civil society relations. Harnessing information gathered from fieldwork, interviews, and document reviews, this paper offers an in-depth case study of the RRH program, with a specific focus on the “resilience” associated with infrastructure, capability, mechanisms, and culture, and the “homeland” associated with safe homes, safe communities, safe schools, and a safe future. The program review revealed useful references for the future development of resilient cities and communities, with people-oriented strategies, community involvement and multi-stakeholder collaborations being the three most salient features. This experimental program also revealed that NGOs and governments could use the institutional opportunities arising from disasters to develop cooperative programs to “build back better” and further facilitate state–civil society relations.

建议了许多实用的计划来建设有复原力的城市和社区，其中许多计划是由政府推动的，着重于防灾而非关注受影响人口的需求。本文讨论的重建抗灾家园（RRH）计划是庐山地震灾后重建项目，由NGO主导，以人为本。因此，本文的目的是确定非政府组织用来领导“更好地重建”重建计划的方法，并确定非政府组织在国家与公民社会关系中可以发挥的作用。利用从野外工作，访谈和文档审查中收集的信息，本文提供了有关RRH计划的深入案例研究，特别关注与基础架构，能力，机制，和文化，以及与安全住宅，安全社区，安全学校和安全未来相关的“家园”。计划审查揭示了抗灾城市和社区未来发展的有用参考，以人为本的战略，社区参与和多方利益相关者的合作是三个最突出的特征。该实验性计划还表明，非政府组织和政府可以利用灾难带来的机构机遇来制定合作计划，以“更好地重建”并进一步促进国家与民间社会的关系。社区参与和多方利益相关者的合作是最突出的三个特征。该实验性计划还表明，非政府组织和政府可以利用灾难带来的机构机遇来制定合作计划，以“更好地重建”并进一步促进国家与民间社会的关系。社区参与和多方利益相关者的合作是最突出的三个特征。该实验性计划还表明，非政府组织和政府可以利用灾难带来的机构机遇来制定合作计划，以“更好地重建”并进一步促进国家与民间社会的关系。