Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Rebuilding resilient homeland: an NGO-led post-Lushan earthquake experimental reconstruction program

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been many practical programs suggested for building resilient cities and communities, many of which have been driven by governments to focus on disaster prevention rather than focusing on the needs of the affected population. The rebuilding resilient homeland (RRH) program discussed in this paper was a post-Lushan earthquake reconstruction, NGO-led, people-oriented experimental program. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to determine the methods used by the NGOs to lead the reconstruction program for “building back better” and identify the role that NGOs can play in state–civil society relations. Harnessing information gathered from fieldwork, interviews, and document reviews, this paper offers an in-depth case study of the RRH program, with a specific focus on the “resilience” associated with infrastructure, capability, mechanisms, and culture, and the “homeland” associated with safe homes, safe communities, safe schools, and a safe future. The program review revealed useful references for the future development of resilient cities and communities, with people-oriented strategies, community involvement and multi-stakeholder collaborations being the three most salient features. This experimental program also revealed that NGOs and governments could use the institutional opportunities arising from disasters to develop cooperative programs to “build back better” and further facilitate state–civil society relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Lu and Xu (2014)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainuddin S, Routray JK (2012) Earthquake hazards and community resilience in Baluchistan. Nat Hazards 63(2):909–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich DP, Meyer MA (2015) Social capital and community resilience. Am Behav Sci 59(2):254–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Amina A, Shinichi E, Hiroyuki S, Chadia W, Virginia M (2015) The Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction: renewing the global commitment to people’s resilience, health, and well-being. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6(2):164–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Anita C, Malcolm W, Alonzo P, Alix S, Wells KB, Mariana H, Jennifer T (2013) Getting actionable about community resilience: the Los Angeles county community disaster resilience program. Am J Public Health 103(7):1181–1189

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan 35(4):216–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett M, Wilkinson S, Mannakkara S (2017) Legislation for building back better of horizontal infrastructure. Disaster Prev Manag 26(1):94–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilau AA, Witt E (2016) An analysis of issues for the management of post-disaster housing reconstruction. Int J Strat Prop Manag 20(3):265–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilau AA, Witt E, Lill I (2015) A framework for managing post-disaster housing reconstruction. Procedia Econ Finance 21(15):313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin R, Stanford L (1998) The Northridge earthquake: community-based approaches to unmet recovery needs. Disasters 22(1):21–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers T (1999) Think again: civil society. Foreign Policy 117:18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi GC, Williams M, Chandra A, Plough A, Eisenman D (2015) Partnerships for community resilience: perspectives from the los angeles county community disaster resilience program. Public Health 129(9):1297–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury MU, Emdad HC (2018) Interpretations of resilience and change and the catalytic roles of media: a case of Canadian daily newspaper discourse on natural disasters. Environ Manage 61(5737):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo I, Leopold L, Baron S (2017) Promoting community preparedness and resilience: a Latino immigrant community–driven program following hurricane sandy. Am J Public Health 107(S2):161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Curnin S, O’Hara D (2019) Nonprofit and public sector interorganizational collaboration in disaster recovery: lessons from the field. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 30(2):277–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube E (2020) The build-back-better concept as a disaster risk reduction strategy for positive reconstruction and sustainable development in Zimbabwe: a literature study. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 43:101401

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford M, Li L (2011) Earthquake reconstruction in Wenchuan: assessing the state overall plan and addressing the ‘forgotten phase’. Appl Geogr 31(3):998–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikenberry AM, Verónica A, Cooper T (2007) Administrative failure and the international NGO response to hurricane Katrina. Public Adm Rev 67(s1):160–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Espia JCP, Fernandez P (2015) Insiders and outsiders: local government and NGO engagement in disaster response in Guimaras, Philippines. Disasters 39(1):51–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill L (2014) Life after the volcano: the embodiment of small island memories and efforts to keep Montserratian culture alive in Preston, UK. Area 46(2):146–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu JY, Hasmath R (2014) The local corporatist state and NGO relations in China. J Contemp China 23(87):516–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang VG (2018) Floating control: examining factors affecting the management of the civil society sector in authoritarian China. Soc Mov Stud 17(4):378–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zhou L, Wei K (2011) 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake recovery government policies and non-governmental organizations’ participation. Asia Pac J Soc Work Dev 21(2):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperiale AJ, Vanclay F (2016) Experiencing local community resilience in action: learning from post-disaster communities. J Rural Stud 47(Part A):204–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam R, Walkerden G (2015) How do links between households and NGOs promote disaster resilience and recovery?: a case study of linking social networks on the Bangladeshi coast. Nat Hazards 78(3):1707–1727

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang Y (2017) The development of grassroots Chinese NGOs following the Wenchuan Earthquake of 2008: three case studies, four Modi Vivendi. Voluntas 28(4):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Ashmore J, Babister E, Kelman I (2008) The meaning of ‘Build Back Better’: evidence from post-tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 16(1):24–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Olshansky RB (2014) The theory and practice of building back better. J Am Plan As 80(4):289–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Lo CWH, Tang SY (2017) Nonprofit policy advocacy under authoritarianism. Public Adm Rev 77(1):103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Wang RY, Dang H (2018) The hidden gaps in rural development: examining peasant–NGO relations through a post-earthquake recovery project in Sichuan, China. China Q 233:43–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Xu J (2014) The progress of emergency response and rescue in china: a comparative analysis of Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes. Nat Hazards 74(2):421–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Xu J (2015) NGO collaboration in community post-disaster reconstruction: field research following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Disasters 39(2):258–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Malalgoda C, Amaratunga D, Haigh R (2013) Creating a disaster resilient built environment in urban cities: the role of local governments in Sri Lanka. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ 6(1):102–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Maly E (2017) Building back better with people centered housing recovery. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 29:84–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannakkara S, Wilkinson S, Potangaroa R (2014) Build back better: implementation in Victorian bushfire reconstruction. Disasters 38(2):267–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga Y, Yamauchi N, Okuyama N (2010) What determines the size of the nonprofit sector? a cross-country analysis of the government failure theory. Voluntas 21(2):180–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutch C (2018) The role of schools in helping communities copes with earthquake disasters: the case of the 2010–2011 New Zealand earthquakes. Environ Hazards 17(4):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikkhah H, Redzuan M (2010) The role of NGOs in promoting empowerment for sustainable community development. J Hum Ecol 30(2):85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Commun Psychol 41(1–2):127–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith A (1990) Post-disaster housing reconstruction and social inequality: a challenge to policy and practice. Disasters 14(1):7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng L, Wu F (2018) Building up alliances and breaking down the state monopoly: the rise of non-governmental disaster relief in China. China Q 234:463–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert KY (1981) The case study crisis: some answers. Adm Sci Q 26(1):58–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Roney B (2011) Earthquakes and civil society: a comparative study of the response of China’s nongovernment organizations to the Wenchuan earthquake. China Inf 25(1):83–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Scannell L, Gifford R (2017) Place attachment enhances psychological need satisfaction. Environ Behav 49(4):359–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R (2003) The role of nongovernmental organizations in earthquake disaster management: an Asian perspective. Reg Dev Dialogue 24(1):117–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R, Goda K (2004) From disaster to sustainable civil society: the Kobe experience. Disasters 28(1):16–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R, Sinha R (2003) Towards sustainable recovery: future challenges after the Gujarat earthquake, India. Risk Manag 5(3):35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieh S, Deng G (2011) An emerging civil society: the impact of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake on grass-roots associations in China. China J 65:181–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiwaku K, Shaw R, Kandel RC, Shrestha SN, Dixit AM (2006) Promotion of disaster education in Nepal: the role of teachers as change agents. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 24(3):403–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiwaku K, Ueda Y, Oikawa Y, Shaw R (2016) School disaster resilience assessment in the affected areas of 2011 East Japan earthquake and tsunami. Nat Hazards 82(1):333–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin ML, Goodstein S (1987) Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. J Volunt Action Res 16(1–2):29–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaans M, Waterhout B (2017) Building up resilience in cities worldwide: rotterdam as participant in the 100 resilient cities programme. Cities 61:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang SY, Lo CWH (2009) The political economy of service organization reform in China: an institutional choice analysis. J Public Adm Res Theor 19(4):731–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang W, Li J, Lei Z, Wang E, Shen W (2015) Creating social–physical resilience to natural disasters: lessons from the Wenchuan earthquake. Nat Hazards 79(2):1111–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Teets JC (2013) Let many civil societies bloom: the rise of consultative authoritarianism in China. The China Quarterly 213:19–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiruppugazh V (2014) Post-disaster reconstruction and institutional mechanisms for risk reduction: a comparative study of three disasters in India. In: Shaw Rajib (ed) Disaster Recovery. Springer, Tokyo, pp 17–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney K (2012) Disaster Governance: social, Political, and Economic Dimensions. Annual Review of Environment & Resource 37(1):341–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend I, Awosoga O, Kulig J, Fan H (2015) Social cohesion and resilience across communities that have experienced a disaster. Nat Hazards 76(2):913–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumini I, Villagra-Islas P, Herrmann-Lunecke G (2017) Evaluating reconstruction effects on urban resilience: a comparison between two Chilean tsunami-prone cities. Nat Hazards 85(3):1363–1392

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat (2011) Shelter and housing: UN habitat in disaster and conflict contexts. http://unhabitat.org.ir/wpcontent/uploads/2019/04/2_Shelter-and-Housing.pdf

  • Vahanvati M, Mulligan M (2017) A new model for effective post-disaster housing reconstruction: lessons from Gujarat and Bihar in India. Int J Progr Manag 35:802–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CY, Guo J, Kuo MF (2020) The building of social resilience in Sichuan after the Wenchuan earthquake: a perspective of the socio-government interactions. Saf Sci 126:104662

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B (2017) “Build back better”? The challenge of Goma and beyond. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 26:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XW, Wen XZ, Han ZJ et al (2013) Lushan M S7. 0 earthquake: a blind reserve-fault event. Chin Sci Bullet 58(28–29):3437–3443

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Xu D, Lu Y (2016) Resident participation in post-Lushan earthquake housing reconstruction: a multi-stage field research method-based inquiry. Environ Hazards 15(2):128–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Wang Q, Xu D, Lu Y (2017) Types of community-focused organisations for disaster risk reduction in the Longmen Shan Fault area. Environ Hazards 17(3):181–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Xu D, Lu Y, Wang Q (2018) A bridged government–NGOs relationship in post-earthquake reconstruction: the Ya’an service center in Lushan earthquake. Nat Hazards 90(2):537–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Y, Sima Z, Muhammad H, Lu Y (2018) Devastating earthquakes facilitating civil societies in developing countries: across-national analysis. Environ Hazards 17(3):352–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Yi L, Zhao D (2013) Community-based disaster management: a review of progress in China. Nat Hazards 65(3):2215–2239

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71704124), the Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 17YJC630096), the Major Program of the Social Science Foundation of Sichuan (Grant No. SC18EZD026), the Research Funding of Sichuan University (Grant No. 2018hhf-43), and the International Visiting Program for Excellent Youth Scholar of SCU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Emergency Management and Reconstruction in Post-Disaster, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Yi Lu

  2. Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Yi Lu & Rui Li

Authors
  1. Yi Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Sichuan University (ethical review No: K2019072). The data collection for interviews are anonymized.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, Y., Li, R. Rebuilding resilient homeland: an NGO-led post-Lushan earthquake experimental reconstruction program. Nat Hazards 104, 853–882 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04194-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04194-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation