当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ann. Rheum. Dis. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Response to ‘‘To switch or not to switch’: the missing piece in the puzzle of biosimilar literature?’ by Scherlinger et al
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ( IF 20.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-01-23 , DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214952
Bente Glintborg 1, 2 , Anne Gitte Loft 3, 4 , Emina Omerovic 5 , Oliver Hendricks 6 , Asta Linauskas 7 , Jakob Espesen 8 , Kamilla Danebod 2 , Dorte Vendelbo Jensen 2 , Henrik Nordin 9 , Emil Barner Dalgaard 10 , Stavros Chrysidis 11 , Salome Kristensen 12 , Johnny Lillelund Raun 13 , Hanne Lindegaard 14 , Natalia Manilo 15 , Susanne Højmark Jakobsen 16 , Inger Marie Jensen Hansen 16 , Dorte Dalsgaard Pedersen 17 , Inge Juul Sørensen 18, 19 , Lis Smedegaard Andersen 20 , Jolanta Grydehøj 21 , Frank Mehnert 22 , Niels Steen Krogh 23 , Merete Lund Hetland 19
Affiliation  

Thank you for the interest1 in our recent publication, in which we explored treatment outcomes following a Danish mandatory switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept (SB4, 50 mg) in routine care.2 We showed that of the 2061 patients who were receiving originator etanercept and thus were eligible for the switch, as many as four of five (79%) switched to the biosimilar, despite the continued availability of the originator drug (as 25 mg pen or 50 mg powder solution). Among the patients who switched, we observed high retention rates of the biosimilar. The 6-month …

中文翻译:

对“转换还是不转换”的回应:生物仿制药难题中的缺失部分?由 Scherlinger 等人撰写

感谢您对我们最近出版物的关注 1,其中我们探讨了丹麦在常规护理中强制从原研药改为生物仿制药依那西普(SB4,50 毫克)后的治疗结果。2 我们展示了在接受原研药依那西普治疗的 2061 名患者中,因此,尽管原始药物(25 毫克笔或 50 毫克粉末溶液)持续可用,但仍有多达五分之四 (79%) 转换为生物仿制药。在转换的患者中,我们观察到生物仿制药的高保留率。为期 6 个月的…
更新日期:2019-01-23
down
wechat
bug