当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Thorac. Oncol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Randomized Non-Comparative Phase 2 Study of Anti-Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Atezolizumab or Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from the IFCT-1603 Trial
Journal of Thoracic Oncology ( IF 20.4 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.008
Jean-Louis Pujol 1 , Laurent Greillier 2 , Clarisse Audigier-Valette 3 , Denis Moro-Sibilot 4 , Lionel Uwer 5 , José Hureaux 6 , Florian Guisier 7 , Delphine Carmier 8 , Jeannick Madelaine 9 , Josiane Otto 10 , Valérie Gounant 11 , Patrick Merle 12 , Pierre Mourlanette 13 , Olivier Molinier 14 , Aldo Renault 15 , Audrey Rabeau 16 , Martine Antoine 17 , Marc G Denis 18 , Sebastien Bommart 19 , Alexandra Langlais 20 , Franck Morin 20 , Pierre-Jean Souquet 21
Affiliation  

Introduction: This randomized phase II trial aimed at evaluating the engineered programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) antibody atezolizumab in SCLC progressing after first‐line platinum–etoposide chemotherapy. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to atezolizumab (1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or conventional chemotherapy (up to 6 cycles of topotecan or re‐induction of initial chemotherapy). Patients were not selected based on PD‐L1 tissue expression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 6 weeks. A two‐stage design with 2:1 randomization and O'Brien‐Fleming stopping rules was used. The null hypothesis was rejected if more than 12 of 45 patients were responders. Results: Overall, 73 patients were randomized (atezolizumab n = 49; chemotherapy n = 24). At 6 weeks, 1 of 43 eligible atezolizumab patients achieved an objective response (2.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0–6.8), whereas 8 others had stable disease (20.9% disease control rate; 95% CI: 8.8–33.1). Among eligible chemotherapy patients (n = 20), 10% achieved an objective response (65% disease control rate). Median progression‐free survival was 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.2–1.5) with atezolizumab and 4.3 months (95% CI: 1.5–5.9) with chemotherapy. Overall survival did not significantly differ between groups. Median overall survival was 9.5 months versus 8.7 months for the atezolizumab and the chemotherapy group, respectively (adjusted hazard ratioatezolizumab: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.45–1.58; p = 0.60). Two atezolizumab patients (4.2%) experienced grade 3 fatigue, and two others grade 1 dysthyroidism. Among 53 evaluable specimens, only 1 (2%) had positive immunohistochemical PD‐L1 staining (SP142 clone). Conclusions: Atezolizumab monotherapy in relapsed SCLC failed to show significant efficacy. No unexpected safety concerns were observed.

中文翻译:

抗程序性细胞死亡配体 1 Atezolizumab 或化疗作为小细胞肺癌患者二线治疗的随机非比较 2 期研究:IFCT-1603 试验的结果

简介:这项随机 II 期试验旨在评估工程化程序性细胞死亡配体 1 (PD-L1) 抗体 atezolizumab 在一线铂-依托泊苷化疗后进展的 SCLC 中的作用。方法:患者以 2:1 的比例随机分配至 atezolizumab(每 3 周静脉注射 1200 mg)直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性,或常规化疗(最多 6 个周期的拓扑替康或重新诱导初始化疗)。患者不是根据 PD-L1 组织表达选择的。主要终点是 6 周时的客观反应率。使用具有 2:1 随机化和 O'Brien-Fleming 停止规则的两阶段设计。如果 45 名患者中有超过 12 名是响应者,则拒绝原假设。结果:总共有 73 名患者被随机分组​​(atezolizumab n = 49;化疗 n = 24)。在第 6 周时,43 名符合条件的 atezolizumab 患者中有 1 名达到客观缓解(2.3%,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.0-6.8),而另外 8 名患者病情稳定(20.9% 疾病控制率;95% CI:8.8-33.1)。在符合条件的化疗患者(n = 20)中,10% 达到了客观反应(65% 的疾病控制率)。Atezolizumab 组的中位无进展生存期为 1.4 个月(95% CI:1.2-1.5),化疗组为 4.3 个月(95% CI:1.5-5.9)。组间总生存期没有显着差异。Atezolizumab 和化疗组的中位总生存期分别为 9.5 个月和 8.7 个月(调整后的风险比值atezolizumab:0.84,95% CI:0.45–1.58;p = 0.60)。两名 atezolizumab 患者 (4.2%) 出现 3 级疲劳,另外两名患者出现 1 级甲状腺功能减退。在 53 个可评价标本中,只有 1 个 (2%) 具有阳性免疫组织化学 PD-L1 染色(SP142 克隆)。结论: Atezolizumab 单药治疗复发性 SCLC 未能显示出显着疗效。没有观察到意外的安全问题。
更新日期:2019-05-01
down
wechat
bug