当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Polygenic Risk Scores in Clinical Psychology: Bridging Genomic Risk to Individual Differences
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology ( IF 17.8 ) Pub Date : 2018-05-07 00:00:00 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084847
Ryan Bogdan 1 , David A A Baranger 1 , Arpana Agrawal 2
Affiliation  

Genomewide association studies (GWASs) across psychiatric phenotypes have shown that common genetic variants generally confer risk with small effect sizes (odds ratio < 1.1) that additively contribute to polygenic risk. Summary statistics derived from large discovery GWASs can be used to generate polygenic risk scores (PRS) in independent, target data sets to examine correlates of polygenic disorder liability (e.g., does genetic liability to schizophrenia predict cognition?). The intuitive appeal and generalizability of PRS have led to their widespread use and new insights into mechanisms of polygenic liability. However, when currently applied across traits they account for small amounts of variance (<3%), are relatively uninformative for clinical treatment, and, in isolation, provide no insight into molecular mechanisms. Larger GWASs are needed to increase the precision of PRS, and novel approaches integrating various data sources (e.g., multitrait analysis of GWASs) may improve the utility of current PRS.

中文翻译:


临床心理学中的多基因风险评分:将基因组风险与个体差异联系起来

跨精神表型的全基因组关联研究 (GWAS) 表明,常见的遗传变异通常会带来较小的风险(比值比 < 1.1),从而进一步增加多基因风险。来自大型发现 GWAS 的汇总统计数据可用于在独立的目标数据集中生成多基因风险评分 (PRS),以检查多基因疾病倾向的相关性(例如,精神分裂症的遗传倾向是否可以预测认知?)。PRS 的直观吸引力和普遍性导致了它们的广泛使用和对多基因责任机制的新见解。然而,当目前跨性状应用时,它们会产生少量差异(<3%),对于临床治疗来说信息相对较少,并且单独而言,无法深入了解分子机制。需要更大的 GWAS 来提高 PRS 的精度,而集成各种数据源的新方法(例如 GWAS 的多特征分析)可以提高当前 PRS 的实用性。

更新日期:2018-05-07
down
wechat
bug