当前位置: X-MOL 学术N. Engl. J. Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Early High-Dose Vitamin D3 for Critically Ill, Vitamin D-Deficient Patients.
The New England Journal of Medicine ( IF 158.5 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-11 , DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1911124
, Adit A Ginde 1 , Roy G Brower 1 , Jeffrey M Caterino 1 , Lani Finck 1 , Valerie M Banner-Goodspeed 1 , Colin K Grissom 1 , Douglas Hayden 1 , Catherine L Hough 1 , Robert C Hyzy 1 , Akram Khan 1 , Joseph E Levitt 1 , Pauline K Park 1 , Nancy Ringwood 1 , Emanuel P Rivers 1 , Wesley H Self 1 , Nathan I Shapiro 1 , B Taylor Thompson 1 , Donald M Yealy 1 , Daniel Talmor 1
Affiliation  

BACKGROUND Vitamin D deficiency is a common, potentially reversible contributor to morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients. The potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in acute critical illness require further study. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of early vitamin D3 supplementation in critically ill, vitamin D-deficient patients who were at high risk for death. Randomization occurred within 12 hours after the decision to admit the patient to an intensive care unit. Eligible patients received a single enteral dose of 540,000 IU of vitamin D3 or matched placebo. The primary end point was 90-day all-cause, all-location mortality. RESULTS A total of 1360 patients were found to be vitamin D-deficient during point-of-care screening and underwent randomization. Of these patients, 1078 had baseline vitamin D deficiency (25-hydroxyvitamin D level, <20 ng per milliliter [50 nmol per liter]) confirmed by subsequent testing and were included in the primary analysis population. The mean day 3 level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D was 46.9±23.2 ng per milliliter (117±58 nmol per liter) in the vitamin D group and 11.4±5.6 ng per milliliter (28±14 nmol per liter) in the placebo group (difference, 35.5 ng per milliliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31.5 to 39.6). The 90-day mortality was 23.5% in the vitamin D group (125 of 531 patients) and 20.6% in the placebo group (109 of 528 patients) (difference, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.1 to 7.9; P = 0.26). There were no clinically important differences between the groups with respect to secondary clinical, physiological, or safety end points. The severity of vitamin D deficiency at baseline did not affect the association between the treatment assignment and mortality. CONCLUSIONS Early administration of high-dose enteral vitamin D3 did not provide an advantage over placebo with respect to 90-day mortality or other, nonfatal outcomes among critically ill, vitamin D-deficient patients. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; VIOLET ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03096314.).

中文翻译:

早期重症维生素D缺乏症患者的大剂量维生素D3。

背景技术维生素D缺乏症是重症患者中发病率和死亡率的常见,潜在可逆因素。在急性危重病中补充维生素D的潜在益处需要进一步研究。方法我们对高危死亡的危重维生素D缺乏症患者进行了一项早期补充维生素D3的随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的3期临床试验。在决定允许患者加入重症监护病房后的12个小时内进行了随机分组。符合条件的患者接受了540,000 IU的维生素D3或匹配安慰剂的单次肠内给药。主要终点是90天全因所有地点的死亡率。结果总共有1360名患者在现场筛查期间被发现缺乏维生素D,并接受了随机分组。在这些病人中 1078名基线维生素D缺乏症(25-羟基维生素D水平,<20 ng /毫升[50 nmol /升])已通过后续测试确认,并纳入了主要分析人群。维生素D组第三天的25-羟基维生素D的平均水平为46.9±23.2 ng /毫升(117±58 nmol /升),而安慰剂组为11.4±5.6 ng /毫升(28±14 nmol /升)(差异,每毫升35.5 ng; 95%置信区间[CI],31.5至39.6)。维生素D组(531名患者中的125名)和安慰剂组(528名患者中的109名)的90天死亡率为23.5%(差异为2.9个百分点; 95%CI为-2.1至7.9; P = 0.26)。在二级临床,生理或安全终点方面,各组之间在临床上没有重要的差异。基线时维生素D缺乏的严重程度不影响治疗分配与死亡率之间的关联。结论就危重病,维生素D缺乏症患者的90天死亡率或其他非致命结局而言,大剂量肠内维生素D3的早期给药并未提供优于安慰剂的优势。(由美国国家心脏,肺和血液研究所资助; VIOLET ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT03096314。)。
更新日期:2019-12-26
down
wechat
bug