当前位置: X-MOL 学术Implement. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Identifying relevant concepts and factors for the sustainability of evidence-based practices within acute care contexts: a systematic review and theory analysis of selected sustainability frameworks.
Implementation Science ( IF 8.8 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-19 , DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0952-9
Letitia Nadalin Penno 1 , Barbara Davies 1 , Ian D Graham 2 , Chantal Backman 1 , Ibo MacDonald 1 , Julie Bain 3 , Alekhya Mascarenhas Johnson 4 , Julia Moore 5 , Janet Squires 1, 6
Affiliation  

BACKGROUND There is growing recognition among healthcare professionals that the sustainability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) within different settings is variable and suboptimal. Understanding why a particular EBP might be sustained in one setting and not another remains unclear. Recent reviews illustrate the need to identify and analyze existing frameworks/models/theories (F/M/Ts) that focus solely on the sustainability of EBPs in specific healthcare settings, such as acute care, to illuminate key determinants and facilitate appropriate selection to guide practice and research. METHODS We conducted a systematic review to extract sustainability frameworks. This involved using two available syntheses of the literature and a systematic search of four databases from January 2015 to July 2018: CINHAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and ProQuest. We included studies published in English, and if they included sustainability F/M/Ts recommended for use in acute care or an unspecified healthcare organization/setting. F/M/Ts explicitly recommended for use in public health and or community settings were excluded. We then conducted a comparative analysis of F/M/Ts using a modified theory analysis approach, to understand the theoretical underpinnings of each F/M/T, their determinants and concepts hypothesized to influence the sustained use of EBPs within an acute care context. RESULTS Of 2967 identified citations from the 2 available syntheses and the systematic review, 8 F/M/Ts met the inclusion criteria. We identified 37 core factors, of which 16 were recorded as common factors (occurring within 4 or more of the 8 included F/M/Ts). All factors grouped into 7 main themes: innovation, adopters, leadership and management, inner context, inner processes, outer context, and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review is the first to include a comprehensive analysis of healthcare sustainability F/M/Ts for the sustained use of EBPs in acute care settings. Findings reveal insights into sustainability as a "process or ongoing stage of use" following initial implementation, suggesting this construct should be added to the definition of sustainability. Results provide a resource of available F/M/Ts and hypothesized factors to consider for acute care team members who are planning or currently implementing EBPs with the goal of improving patient outcomes. It also provides a basis for future research on sustainability in acute care.

中文翻译:

确定急性护理环境下循证实践可持续性的相关概念和因素:对选定可持续性框架的系统回顾和理论分析。

背景技术在医疗保健专业人员中越来越多地认识到,在不同环境中基于证据的实践(EBP)的可持续性是可变的且不是最佳的。尚不清楚为什么特定的EBP可以在一种情况下维持而在另一种情况下不能维持。最近的审查表明,有必要确定和分析现有框架/模型/理论(F / M / T),这些框架/模型/理论仅关注急诊等特定医疗环境中的EBP的可持续性,以阐明关键决定因素并促进适当的选择以指导实践和研究。方法我们进行了系统的审查以提取可持续性框架。这涉及使用文献的两种可用合成方法以及从2015年1月至2018年7月对四个数据库的系统搜索:CINHAL,MEDLINE,Embase和ProQuest。我们纳入了以英语发表的研究,并且如果研究包括推荐用于急诊或未指定医疗机构/环境的可持续性F / M / T。明确建议在公共卫生和/或社区环境中使用的F / M / T不包括在内。然后,我们使用改进的理论分析方法对F / M / T进行了比较分析,以了解每个F / M / T的理论基础,其决定因素和被认为会影响急性护理环境中EBP持续使用的概念。结果从2个可用合成方法和系统评价中确定的2967个引用中,有8个F / M / T符合纳入标准。我们确定了37个核心因素,其中16个被记录为共同因素(发生在8个包含的F / M / T中,其中4个或更多)。所有因素都归纳为7个主要主题:创新,采用者,领导和管理,内部环境,内部流程,外部环境和结果。结论这项系统评价是首次包括对医疗保健可持续性F / M / T进行综合分析,以在急诊环境中持续使用EBP。研究结果揭示了在最初实施后对可持续性的洞察,将其作为“使用过程或使用中的持续阶段”,这表明应将此构想添加到可持续性的定义中。结果为计划或当前正在实施EBP以改善患者预后的急救团队成员提供了可用的F / M / T和假设因素的资源。它也为未来急性护理可持续性研究提供了基础。结论该系统评价是首次包括对医疗保健可持续性F / M / T进行综合分析,以在急诊环境中持续使用EBP。研究结果揭示了在最初实施后对可持续性的洞察,将其作为“使用过程或使用中的持续阶段”,这表明应将此构想添加到可持续性的定义中。结果为计划或当前实施EBP以改善患者预后的急诊团队成员提供了可用的F / M / T和假设因素的资源。它也为未来急性护理可持续性研究提供了基础。结论该系统评价是首次包括对医疗保健可持续性F / M / T进行综合分析,以在急诊环境中持续使用EBP。研究结果揭示了在最初实施后对可持续性的洞察,将其作为“使用过程或使用中的持续阶段”,这表明应将此构想添加到可持续性的定义中。结果为计划或当前正在实施EBP以改善患者预后的急救团队成员提供了可用的F / M / T和假设因素的资源。它也为未来急性护理可持续性研究提供了基础。研究结果揭示了在最初实施后将可持续性作为“使用过程或进行中的使用阶段”的见解,建议应将此构想添加到可持续性的定义中。结果为计划或当前正在实施EBP以改善患者预后的急救团队成员提供了可用的F / M / T和假设因素的资源。它还为将来在急诊中的可持续性研究提供了基础。研究结果揭示了在最初实施后对可持续性的洞察,将其作为“使用过程或使用中的持续阶段”,这表明应将此构想添加到可持续性的定义中。结果为计划或当前正在实施EBP以改善患者预后的急救团队成员提供了可用的F / M / T和假设因素的资源。它还为将来在急诊中的可持续性研究提供了基础。结果为计划或当前正在实施EBP以改善患者预后的急救团队成员提供了可用的F / M / T和假设因素的资源。它也为未来急性护理可持续性研究提供了基础。结果为计划或当前正在实施EBP以改善患者预后的急救团队成员提供了可用的F / M / T和假设因素的资源。它也为未来急性护理可持续性研究提供了基础。
更新日期:2020-04-22
down
wechat
bug