Evidence for preventive treatments in young patients at clinical high risk of psychosis: the need for context.,The Lancet Psychiatry

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Lancet Psychiatry › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Evidence for preventive treatments in young patients at clinical high risk of psychosis: the need for context.
The Lancet Psychiatry ( IF 30.8 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-19 , DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30513-9
Barnaby Nelson ₁ , Günter P Amminger ₁ , Andreas Bechdolf ₂ , Paul French ₃ , Ashok Malla ₄ , Anthony P Morrison ₅ , Stefanie J Schmidt ₆ , Jai L Shah ₄ , Andrew Thompson ₁ , Mark Van der Gaag ₇ , Stephen J Wood ₈ , Scott W Woods ₉ , Alison R Yung ₁₀ , Patrick D McGorry ₁

Affiliation

Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban und Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain/Charite-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester West Mental Health National Health Service Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Cochrane reviews, as rigorous evaluations of evidence in health care, have a substantial effect on clinical and policy decision-making; however, their findings and methods need to be contextualised. These reviews are done by groups of academics who might or might not have adequate expertise or clinical experience in the field they examine, and we feel the methods can be indeterminate and conservative.

中文翻译：

在临床上患有精神病高风险的年轻患者中进行预防性治疗的证据：对背景的需求。

作为对卫生保健中证据的严格评估，Cochrane审查对临床和政策决策具有重大影响；但是，他们的发现和方法需要结合实际情况。这些评论是由可能在或可能不在研究领域拥有足够专业知识或临床经验的学者团体完成的，我们认为这些方法可能不确定且保守。

更新日期：2019-12-19

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊最新论文