Individual placement and support (IPS) has shown consistently better outcomes on competitive employment for patients with severe mental illness than traditional vocational rehabilitation. The evidence for efficacy originates from few countries, and generalization to different countries has been questioned. This has delayed implementation of IPS and led to requests for country‐specific RCTs. This meta‐analysis examines if evidence for IPS efficacy can be generalized between rather different countries.

中文翻译：

---

政策对个人安置和支持效力影响的元回归

与传统的职业康复相比，个人安置和支持 (IPS) 在严重精神疾病患者的竞争性就业方面一直显示出更好的结果。有效性的证据来自少数国家，对不同国家的推广受到质疑。这推迟了 IPS 的实施，并导致要求针对特定国家的 RCT。这项荟萃分析检验了 IPS 功效的证据是否可以在相当不同的国家之间推广。