当前位置: X-MOL 学术Digest. Endosc. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of Papanicolaou and diff‐quick staining in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound‐fine needle aspiration biopsy with rapid on‐site cytologic evaluation
Digestive Endoscopy ( IF 5.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-01 , DOI: 10.1111/den.13604
Yasutoshi Shiratori 1 , Takashi Ikeya 1 , Kenji Nakamura 2
Affiliation  

Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) is a widely used diagnostic method for pathologies such as biliary and pancreatic diseases, and intra-abdominal tumors. The usefulness of rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) in improving the accuracy of diagnosis has been reported in past meta-analysis1-3 . However, few reports have compared different staining methods in ROSE. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic EUS-FNA with ROSE and compare the staining methods between rapid Papanicolaou staining (Fig. 1 A-B) and Diff-Quick staining (Fig. 2 A-B) for diagnosis.

中文翻译:

巴氏染色和 diff-quick 染色在胰腺内镜超声细针穿刺活检中的比较与快速现场细胞学评估

内窥镜超声细针穿刺活检 (EUS-FNA) 是一种广泛用于胆道和胰腺疾病以及腹腔内肿瘤等病理的诊断方法。过去的荟萃分析报告了快速现场细胞学评估 (ROSE) 在提高诊断准确性方面的有用性 1-3 。然而,很少有报告比较 ROSE 中不同的染色方法。本研究旨在评估胰腺 EUS-FNA 与 ROSE 的有效性,并比较快速巴氏染色(图 1 AB)和 Diff-Quick 染色(图 2 AB)之间的染色方法进行诊断。
更新日期:2020-03-01
down
wechat
bug