当前位置：
X-MOL 学术
›
Natl. Sci. Rev.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Long march for healthy research ecology
National Science Review ( IF 16.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-25 , DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwz126 Wei Yang 1
National Science Review ( IF 16.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-25 , DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwz126 Wei Yang 1
Affiliation
In recent years, the research community in China has launched five campaigns against research misconduct. The first one started at the turn of this century and enabled whistleblowers to flag fabrication, falsification and plagiarism violations during promotions and in talent reviews. Investigations would proceed when the allegation contained verifiable details. Clear signals were sent to researchers, who took the chance of ‘not getting caught’. The second campaign started around 2005 and sought to eliminate duplicate submissions for publication in a different language. In 2007, the Chinese Medical Association established the rule of no duplicate publication in a different language. The copyright law in China also was revised. The third campaign involved the engagement of similarity checks for dissertations, grants and journal submissions. Universities began to perform a full check on all theses submitted for degrees. The National Natural Science Foundation of China installed similarity check software in their system for all submitted grant proposals. All similarities were classified according to their severity and earmarked during the subsequent peer reviews.
更新日期：2019-09-25
京公网安备 11010802027423号