Tadmor et al.'s 2009 PRL article shows experiments of pendant drops with ∼30% higher retention forces than their sessile analogues. A recent article (de la Madrid, R. et al. Langmuir 2019, 35, 2871) seemingly explains this result theoretically using a drastically different experimental system that shows a ∼3% higher force that exceeds the scatter in three out of four data points. The differences between the two experimental systems might have allowed the two theories to coexist, but Tadmor's theory, which can explain both, allows an understanding of the solid-liquid interaction, which the newer theory lacks.

中文翻译：

---

评论“对无柄，垂饰和倒置无柄水滴的横向保持力的比较”。

Tadmor等人在2009年发表的PRL文章显示，悬垂液滴的实验保留力比其无柄类似物高约30％。最近的一篇文章（de la Madrid，R. et al.Langmuir 2019，35，2871）似乎在理论上使用了完全不同的实验系统解释了这一结果，该实验系统显示出高出约3％的力，超过了四个数据点中的三个数据点的散点。两种实验系统之间的差异可能使两种理论可以共存，但是可以解释这两种理论的塔德莫尔理论允许对固液相互作用的理解，而这是较新的理论所缺乏的。