当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Impot. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Sexual function outcomes following interventions for prostate cancer: are contemporary reports on functional outcomes misleading?
International Journal of Impotence Research ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-13 , DOI: 10.1038/s41443-019-0220-1
Catherine E Lovegrove 1 , Vincenzo Ficarra 2 , Francesco Montorsi 3, 4 , James N'Dow 5 , Andrea Salonia 3, 4 , Suks Minhas 1
Affiliation  

Patients with primary localised prostate cancer (PCa) have a wide choice of curative therapeutic interventions, including active surveillance, surgical, focal and radiation therapies. Based on clinical and oncological characteristics, treatment decisions entail consideration of oncological and functional outcomes with important effects on quality of life. We aimed to highlight evidence surrounding present inconsistencies, the problems this presents to clinicians and patients alike and the rationale for using return to baseline as a more realistic and objective functional outcome measure for assessing sexual function in this particularly sensitive group of men. We performed a non-systematic literature review of numerous non-validated, arbitrary thresholds employed in evaluation of sexual function outcomes in men undergoing intervention for primary localised PCa. The literature presents much heterogeneity in measurement methods and outcome measures, which lack context and present difficulties when counselling patients to make informed, autonomous decisions. These include findings from the most widely used internationally validated tools, such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), UCLA prostate cancer index and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30). There is a need for standardisation of reporting outcomes following PCa treatment to facilitate evaluation of existing and emerging technologies.

中文翻译:

前列腺癌干预后的性功能预后:关于功能预后的当代报道是否有误导性?

患有原发性局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的患者可以选择多种治疗性干预措施,包括主动监测,手术,局部和放射治疗。根据临床和肿瘤学特征,治疗决策需要考虑对生活质量具有重要影响的肿瘤学和功能结局。我们的目的是强调围绕当前矛盾之处的证据,这给临床医生和患者带来了问题,以及使用基线回归作为评估这组特别敏感的男性性功能的更现实和客观的功能结局指标的理由。我们对众多未经验证的文献进行了非系统的文献综述,评估接受局部原发性PCa干预的男性性功能结果的任意阈值。文献提供了很多测量方法和结果测量方法的异质性,这些方法缺乏背景,并且在指导患者做出知情的,自主的决定时会遇到困难。这些包括最广泛使用的国际认可工具的发现,例如国际勃起功能指数(IIEF),UCLA前列腺癌指数和欧洲研究与治疗癌症生活质量调查问卷Core 30(QLQ-C30)。有必要对PCa治疗后的报告结果进行标准化,以促进对现有技术和新兴技术的评估。在指导患者做出知情的,自主的决策时,这些缺乏上下文并且存在困难。这些包括最广泛使用的国际认可工具的发现,例如国际勃起功能指数(IIEF),UCLA前列腺癌指数和欧洲研究与治疗癌症生活质量调查问卷Core 30(QLQ-C30)。有必要对PCa治疗后的报告结果进行标准化,以促进对现有技术和新兴技术的评估。在指导患者做出知情的,自主的决定时,这些缺乏情境并带来困难。这些包括最广泛使用的国际认可工具的发现,例如国际勃起功能指数(IIEF),UCLA前列腺癌指数和欧洲研究与治疗癌症生活质量调查问卷Core 30(QLQ-C30)。有必要对PCa治疗后的报告结果进行标准化,以促进对现有技术和新兴技术的评估。UCLA前列腺癌指数和欧洲癌症生活质量研究和治疗组织Core-30(QLQ-C30)。有必要对PCa治疗后的报告结果进行标准化,以促进对现有技术和新兴技术的评估。UCLA前列腺癌指数和欧洲癌症生活质量研究和治疗组织Core-30(QLQ-C30)。有必要对PCa治疗后的报告结果进行标准化,以促进对现有技术和新兴技术的评估。
更新日期:2019-12-13
down
wechat
bug