当前位置: X-MOL 学术Spinal Cord › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Motor imagery for pain and motor function after spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
Spinal Cord ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-13 , DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0390-1
Emmanuelle Opsommer 1 , Odile Chevalley 1 , Natalya Korogod 1
Affiliation  

STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the therapeutic benefits of motor imagery (MI) for the people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING International. METHODS We searched electronic bibliographic databases, trial registers, and relevant reference lists. The review included experimental and quasi-experimental study designs as well as observational studies. For the critical appraisal of the 18 studies retrieved (three RCT, seven quasi-RCT, eight observational), we used instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. The primary outcome measure was pain. Secondary outcome measures included motor function and neurophysiological parameters. Adverse effects were extracted if reported in the included studies. Because of data heterogeneity, only a qualitative synthesis is offered. RESULTS The included studies involved 282 patients. In most, results were an improvement in motor function and decreased pain; however, some reported no effect or an increase in pain. Although protocols of MI intervention were heterogeneous, sessions of 8-20 min were used for pain treatments, and of 30-60 min were used for motor function improvement. Neurophysiological measurements showed changes in brain region activation and excitability imposed by SCI, which were partially recovered by MI interventions. No serious adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS High heterogeneity in the SCI population, MI interventions, and outcomes measured makes it difficult to judge the therapeutic effects and best MI intervention protocol, especially for people with SCI with neuropathic pain. Further clinical trials evaluating MI intervention as adjunct therapy for pain in SCI patients are warranted.

中文翻译:

脊髓损伤后疼痛和运动功能的运动影像:系统评价。

研究设计系统评价。目的评估运动成像(MI)对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的治疗效果。设置国际。方法我们搜索了电子书目数据库,审判登记册和相关参考文献清单。审查包括实验和准实验研究设计以及观察性研究。对于检索到的18项研究的严格评估(3项RCT,7项准RCT,8项观察性),我们使用了乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的仪器。主要结果指标是疼痛。次要结局指标包括运动功能和神经生理参数。如果纳入的研究中有报道,则提取不良反应。由于数据异质性,仅提供定性综合。结果纳入的研究涉及282例患者。在大多数情况下,结果是运动功能的改善和疼痛的减轻。但是,有些报告没有效果或疼痛加剧。尽管MI干预的方案是异类的,但是8-20分钟的疗程用于疼痛治疗,而30-60分钟的疗程用于改善运动功能。神经生理学测量显示,SCI引起的大脑区域激活和兴奋性改变,部分通过MI干预得以恢复。没有严重不良反应的报道。结论SCI人群,MI干预和测量结果的高度异质性使得难以判断治疗效果和最佳MI干预方案,尤其是对于神经性疼痛SCI患者。有必要进行进一步的临床试验,评估MI干预作为SCI患者疼痛的辅助治疗。结果是运动功能的改善和疼痛的减轻;但是,有些报告没有效果或疼痛加剧。尽管MI干预的方案是异类的,但是8-20分钟的疗程用于疼痛治疗,而30-60分钟的疗程用于改善运动功能。神经生理学测量显示,SCI引起的大脑区域激活和兴奋性改变,部分通过MI干预得以恢复。没有严重不良反应的报道。结论SCI人群,MI干预和测量结果的高度异质性使得难以判断治疗效果和最佳MI干预方案,尤其是对于神经性疼痛SCI患者。有必要进行进一步的临床试验,评估MI干预作为SCI患者疼痛的辅助治疗。结果是运动功能的改善和疼痛的减轻;但是,有些报告没有效果或疼痛加剧。尽管MI干预的方案是异类的,但是8-20分钟的疗程用于疼痛治疗,而30-60分钟的疗程用于改善运动功能。神经生理学测量显示,SCI引起的大脑区域激活和兴奋性改变,部分通过MI干预得以恢复。没有严重不良反应的报道。结论SCI人群,MI干预和测量结果的高度异质性使得难以判断治疗效果和最佳MI干预方案,尤其是对于神经性疼痛SCI患者。有必要进行进一步的临床试验,评估MI干预作为SCI患者疼痛的辅助治疗。
更新日期:2019-12-13
down
wechat
bug