Hoerl & McCormack's theory defines temporal behavior from an awareness of time, but lacks one critical element: the impact of “psychological presence” in the “moment now.” Central to experience of temporal non-stationarity: “Nowness” links future with past in the context of time flow. Does this differ between species? Evidence suggests not: Different temporal experiences between species requires greater critical evaluation.

中文翻译：

---

当下的众生

Hoerl & McCormack 的理论根据对时间的认识来定义时间行为，但缺少一个关键要素：“心理存在”对“当下”的影响。时间非平稳性体验的核心：“现在性”在时间流的背景下将未来与过去联系起来。这在物种之间有区别吗？证据表明并非如此：物种之间不同的时间经历需要更严格的评估。