当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Refract. Surg. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Topography-Guided Ablation Targeting the Anterior Corneal Astigmatism Yields Inferior Outcomes vs Targeting the Manifest Refractive Astigmatism.
Journal of Refractive Surgery ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-01 , DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20191030-01
Avi Wallerstein , Mathieu Gauvin , Mark Cohen 1
Affiliation  

We read with interest the article by Zhang and Chen, “A Randomized Comparative Study of Topography-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism” in the September issue.1 The authors state that “Kanellopoulos and Wallerstein et al. found that topography-modified refraction offered superior refractive and visual outcomes to standard clinical refraction in myopic TCAT LASIK [topography-guided customized ablation treatment laser in situ keratomileusis] (p. 580).”1 This statement is incorrect. Kanellopoulos does make that claim,2 but our study3 reports

中文翻译:

地形引导的消融靶向前角膜散光与靶向明显的屈光散光相比效果较差。

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了张和陈的文章,“ 9月号的地形引导与波前优化的FS-LASIK矫正近视和近视散光的随机比较研究”。1作者指出,“ Kanellopoulos和Wallerstein等” 。他们发现,在近视TCAT LASIK [地形引导的定制消融治疗原位角膜磨镶术]中,经地形改良的屈光提供比标准临床屈光更好的屈光和视觉效果(第580页)。” 1这种说法是不正确的。Kanellopoulos确实提出了这一主张,2但我们的研究3报告
更新日期:2019-12-13
down
wechat
bug