当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. J. Heart Fail. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan shortly after hospitalisation for acutely decompensated heart failure in patients with newly diagnosed (de novo) heart failure: a subgroup analysis of the TRANSITION study.
European Journal of Heart Failure ( IF 16.9 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-09 , DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1670
Michele Senni 1 , Rolf Wachter 2, 3 , Klaus K Witte 4 , Ewa Straburzynska-Migaj 5 , Jan Belohlavek 6 , Candida Fonseca 7 , Christian Mueller 8 , Eva Lonn 9 , Arhit Chakrabarti 10 , Weibin Bao 11 , Adele Noe 12 , Heike Schwende 12 , Dmytro Butylin 12 , Domingo Pascual-Figal 13 ,
Affiliation  

AIMS Sacubitril/valsartan has shown efficacy and tolerability in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the ambulatory setting (PARADIGM-HF), and following stabilisation of acutely decompensated HF (ADHF) (PIONEER-HF and TRANSITION). However, data are lacking for the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in newly diagnosed (de novo) HFrEF. Here, we assess the tolerability of initiating sacubitril/valsartan following ADHF in TRANSITION subgroups of patients with a de novo vs. prior diagnosis of HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS TRANSITION randomised 1002 patients to pre- and post-discharge initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (analysis set n = 991, following exclusions for mis-randomisation). In this post-hoc analysis, tolerability to sacubitril/valsartan [proportion of patients achieving target dose (97/103 mg b.i.d.) at 10 weeks post-randomisation], adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were compared in de novo (n = 286) and prior HFrEF (n = 705) subgroups. More de novo than prior HFrEF patients achieved target dose at Week 10 (56% vs. 45%; relative risk ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.52, P < 0.001), and fewer had SAEs and permanent treatment discontinuations. Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan did not prevent the concomitant initiation and up-titration of guideline-directed HF therapies. De novo patients showed faster and greater decreases in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin-T, and lower rates of HF and all-cause rehospitalisation vs. prior HFrEF. CONCLUSIONS After ADHF, first-line initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in de novo HFrEF, alongside the initiation of other guideline-directed therapies, is feasible and is associated with a better risk-benefit profile than in patients with prior HFrEF. Early intervention with sacubitril/valsartan may be considered to delay disease progression in patients with de novo HFrEF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02661217.

中文翻译:

住院后不久因新诊断(新发)心力衰竭患者急性失代偿性心力衰竭而开始使用沙比特利/缬沙坦:TRANSITION研究的亚组分析。

AIMS Sacubitril /缬沙坦对动态失调的心衰(HF)和射血分数降低(HFrEF)的患者(PARADIGM-HF)以及急性失代偿性HF(ADHF)稳定后(PIONEER-HF和TRANSITION)均显示出疗效和耐受性)。但是,尚缺乏新诊断(从头开始)HFrEF中启动沙奎特利/缬沙坦的数据。在这里,我们评估了从头开始与先前诊断为HFrEF的患者的TRANSTION亚组中ADHF引发沙库普利/缬沙坦的耐受性。方法和结果过渡期将1002例患者随机分组至出院前和服用沙比特利/缬沙坦开始(分析组n = 991,排除误随机后)。在此事后分析中,对沙比特利/缬沙坦的耐受性[达到目标剂量(97/103 mg bid ),在随机分配后10周],对从头(n = 286)和以前的HFrEF(n = 705)亚组的不良事件(AE)和严重的AE(SAE)进行了比较。在第10周,达到既定剂量的HFrEF患者比从头开始的多(56%比45%;相对危险比1.30,95%置信区间1.12-1.52,P <0.001),并且SAE和永久治疗中止的患者更少。沙必比尔/缬沙坦的启动并不能阻止指导性HF疗法的同时启动和滴定。从头开始的患者与以前的HFrEF相比,N端前B型利尿钠肽和高敏感性肌钙蛋白T下降更快,更大,并且HF率降低和全因住院。结论ADHF后,从头开始在新的HFrEF中进行沙比特利/缬沙坦的一线治疗,以及其他指导性治疗的开始,与既往HFrEF患者相比,这是可行的,并且具有更好的风险获益特征。可以考虑早期接受沙必比尔/缬沙坦干预,以延迟新发HFrEF患者的疾病进展。临床试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02661217。
更新日期:2019-12-11
down
wechat
bug