当前位置: X-MOL 学术Health Res. Policy Syst. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews.
Health Research Policy and Systems ( IF 3.6 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-30 , DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5
Danielle de Moissac 1 , Sarah Bowen 2 , Ingrid Botting 3 , Ian D Graham 4, 5 , Martha MacLeod 6 , Karen Harlos 7 , Charity Maritim Songok 8 , Monique Bohémier 9
Affiliation  

BACKGROUND Partnerships between academic researchers and health system leadership are often promoted by health research funding agencies as an important strategy in helping ensure that funded research is relevant and the results used. While potential benefits of such partnerships have been identified, there is limited guidance in the scientific literature for either healthcare organisations or researchers on how to select, build and manage effective research partnerships. Our main research objective was to explore the health system perspective on partnerships with researchers with a focus on issues related to the design and organisation of the health system and services. Two structured web reviews were conducted as one component of this larger study. METHODS Two separate structured web reviews were conducted using structured data extraction tools. The first review focused on sites of health research bodies and those providing information on health system management and knowledge translation (n = 38) to identify what guidance to support partnerships might be available on websites commonly accessed by health leaders and researchers. The second reviewed sites from all health 'regions' in Canada (n = 64) to determine what criteria and standards were currently used in guiding decisions to engage in research partnerships; phone follow-up ensured all relevant information was collected. RESULTS Absence of guidance on partnerships between research institutions and health system leaders was found. In the first review, absence of guidance on research partnerships and knowledge coproduction was striking and in contrast with coverage of other forms of collaboration such as patient/community engagement. In the second review, little evidence of criteria and standards regarding research partnerships was found. Difficulties in finding appropriate contact information for those responsible for research and obtaining a response were commonly experienced. CONCLUSION Guidance related to health system partnerships with academic researchers is lacking on websites that should promote and support such collaborations. Health region websites provide little evidence of partnership criteria and often do not make contact information to research leaders within health systems readily available; this may hinder partnership development between health systems and academia.

中文翻译:

致力于研究合作伙伴关系的证据?两次网络评论的结果。

背景技术卫生研究资助机构通常促进学术研究人员与卫生系统领导者之间的伙伴关系,作为帮助确保资助的研究是相关的和使用的结果的重要策略。尽管已经确定了这种伙伴关系的潜在好处,但是在科学文献中,对于医疗组织或研究人员如何选择,建立和管理有效的研究伙伴关系的指导有限。我们的主要研究目标是探讨卫生系统与研究人员建立伙伴关系的观点,重点是与卫生系统和服务的设计和组织有关的问题。作为此较大研究的组成部分,进行了两次结构化的Web评论。方法使用结构化数据提取工具进行了两个单独的结构化Web评论。第一次审查的重点是卫生研究机构的站点以及提供有关卫生系统管理和知识翻译的信息的站点(n = 38),以确定哪些指南可以支持卫生伙伴和研究人员通常访问的伙伴关系。第二次审查来自加拿大所有健康“地区”的站点(n = 64),以确定当前在指导决策以建立研究伙伴关系时使用了哪些标准和标准;电话跟进以确保收集了所有相关信息。结果发现缺乏有关研究机构与卫生系统负责人之间伙伴关系的指南。在第一篇评论中,缺乏有关研究合作伙伴关系和知识共同生产的指导的情况令人震惊,并且与其他合作形式(如患者/社区参与)的报道形成了鲜明对比。在第二次审查中,几乎没有发现有关研究合作伙伴关系的标准和标准的证据。通常很难找到负责研究人员的适当联系信息并获得答复。结论在应促进和支持这种合作的网站上缺乏与卫生系统与学术研究人员建立伙伴关系的指导。卫生区域网站几乎没有提供有关合作伙伴标准的证据,并且经常不向卫生系统内的研究负责人提供联系信息;这可能会阻碍卫生系统与学术界之间的伙伴关系发展。在第二次审查中,几乎没有发现有关研究合作伙伴关系的标准和标准的证据。通常很难找到负责研究人员的适当联系信息并获得答复。结论在应促进和支持这种合作的网站上缺乏与卫生系统与学术研究人员建立伙伴关系的指导。卫生区域网站几乎没有提供有关合作伙伴标准的证据,并且经常不向卫生系统内的研究负责人提供联系信息;这可能会阻碍卫生系统与学术界之间的伙伴关系发展。在第二次审查中,几乎没有发现有关研究合作伙伴关系的标准和标准的证据。通常很难找到负责研究人员的适当联系信息并获得答复。结论在应促进和支持这种合作的网站上缺乏与卫生系统与学术研究人员建立伙伴关系的指导。卫生区域网站几乎没有提供有关合作伙伴标准的证据,并且经常不向卫生系统内的研究负责人提供联系信息;这可能会阻碍卫生系统与学术界之间的伙伴关系发展。通常很难找到负责研究人员的适当联系信息并获得答复。结论在应促进和支持这种合作的网站上缺乏与卫生系统与学术研究人员建立伙伴关系的指导。卫生区域网站几乎没有提供有关合作伙伴标准的证据,并且经常不向卫生系统内的研究负责人提供联系信息;这可能会阻碍卫生系统与学术界之间的伙伴关系发展。通常很难找到负责研究人员的适当联系信息并获得答复。结论在应促进和支持这种合作的网站上缺乏与卫生系统与学术研究人员建立伙伴关系的指导。卫生区域网站几乎没有提供有关合作伙伴标准的证据,并且经常不向卫生系统内的研究负责人提供联系信息;这可能会阻碍卫生系统与学术界之间的伙伴关系发展。卫生区域网站几乎没有提供有关合作伙伴标准的证据,并且经常不向卫生系统内的研究负责人提供联系信息;这可能会阻碍卫生系统与学术界之间的伙伴关系发展。卫生区域网站几乎没有提供有关合作伙伴标准的证据,并且经常不向卫生系统内的研究负责人提供联系信息;这可能会阻碍卫生系统与学术界之间的伙伴关系发展。
更新日期:2019-07-30
down
wechat
bug