Implicit biases are present in the general population and among professionals in various domains, where they can lead to discrimination. Many interventions are used to reduce implicit bias. However, uncertainties remain as to their effectiveness. We conducted a systematic review by searching ERIC, PUBMED and PSYCHINFO for peer-reviewed studies conducted on adults between May 2005 and April 2015, testing interventions designed to reduce implicit bias, with results measured using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) or sufficiently similar methods. 30 articles were identified as eligible. Some techniques, such as engaging with others’ perspective, appear unfruitful, at least in short term implicit bias reduction, while other techniques, such as exposure to counterstereotypical exemplars, are more promising. Robust data is lacking for many of these interventions. Caution is thus advised when it comes to programs aiming at reducing biases. This does not weaken the case for implementing widespread structural and institutional changes that are multiply justified.

中文翻译：

---

旨在减少现实世界中隐性偏见和隐性刻板印象的干预措施：系统评价

隐性偏见存在于普通人群和各个领域的专业人士中，可能导致歧视。许多干预措施用于减少隐性偏见。然而，其有效性仍存在不确定性。我们通过在 ERIC、PUBMED 和 PSYCHINFO 中搜索 2005 年 5 月至 2015 年 4 月期间针对成人进行的同行评审研究，进行了系统回顾，测试了旨在减少内隐偏见的干预措施，并使用内隐关联测试 (IAT) 或足够相似的方法测量结果。30 篇文章被确定为合格。一些技术，例如吸收他人的观点，似乎没有成效，至少在短期内减少隐性偏见，而其他技术，例如接触反刻板范例，则更有希望。其中许多干预措施都缺乏可靠的数据。因此，在涉及旨在减少偏见的计划时，建议谨慎行事。这并没有削弱实施广泛的结构和制度变革的理由，这些变革是有多重理由的。