当前位置: X-MOL 学术BMC Med. Ethics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Disability, vulnerability and assisted death: commentary on Tuffrey-Wijne, Curfs, Finlay and Hollins.
BMC Medical Ethics ( IF 3.0 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-27 , DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0426-2
Tim Stainton 1
Affiliation  

This paper builds on the work of Tuffrey-Wijne et al. and explores the issue of vulnerability and persons with disabilities in relation to Euthnasia and Assisted Dying (EAS). The commentary draws on both the literature and on case examples from Canada. Specifically, it considers the issue of EAS as an alternative to, or substituted for, appropriate disability supports. Secondly, it considers the issue of the devaluation of disabled lives in general and within health care practice and ethics. It concludes that current safeguards are inadequate and that as EAS regimes become more permissive the risk to disabled persons will increase.

中文翻译:

残疾,脆弱性和辅助死亡:对Tuffrey-Wijne,Culfs,Finlay和Hollins的评论。

本文以Tuffrey-Wijne等人的工作为基础。并探讨了与欧亚大陆和辅助死亡(EAS)相关的脆弱性和残疾人问题。评注借鉴了加拿大的文献资料和案例。具体来说,它认为EAS问题可以替代或替代适当的残障支持。其次,它考虑了一般情况下以及在医疗保健实践和道德规范中残疾人生活贬值的问题。结论是,目前的保障措施不足,并且随着EAS制度的放宽,对残疾人的风险将增加。
更新日期:2020-04-22
down
wechat
bug