当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Nat. Rev. Cardiol.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Assessing hypertension therapies: randomization or confounding by indication?
Nature Reviews Cardiology ( IF 41.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-01 , DOI: 10.1038/s41569-019-0313-z Sverre E Kjeldsen 1, 2 , Ingrid Os 2, 3
Nature Reviews Cardiology ( IF 41.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-01 , DOI: 10.1038/s41569-019-0313-z Sverre E Kjeldsen 1, 2 , Ingrid Os 2, 3
Affiliation
Findings from a large, international study comprising 4.9 million people with mild hypertension suggest that thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics might be more effective and safer than other first-line antihypertensive drugs. However, the study was not randomized, and the findings might be explained by a phenomenon known as ‘confounding by indication’.
中文翻译:
评估高血压疗法:随机分配还是因适应症而混淆?
一项涉及490万人的轻度高血压的大型国际研究发现,噻嗪类和噻嗪类利尿剂可能比其他一线抗高血压药更有效,更安全。但是,该研究不是随机的,其发现可能由一种被称为“适应症混淆”的现象来解释。
更新日期:2019-11-26
中文翻译:
评估高血压疗法:随机分配还是因适应症而混淆?
一项涉及490万人的轻度高血压的大型国际研究发现,噻嗪类和噻嗪类利尿剂可能比其他一线抗高血压药更有效,更安全。但是,该研究不是随机的,其发现可能由一种被称为“适应症混淆”的现象来解释。