A considerable collection of VARTM choices for composite manufacturing techniques can be both found in literature as well as in industry. Each manufacturing process provides different benefits that must be carefully considered depending on the final application of the desired composite. Here, we present a performance comparison in terms of process effectiveness related to fibre volume fraction, the magnitude of thickness variation, and void contents of 16 laminated composites manufactured by different variants of VARTM (DBVI, VAP, and CAPRI) as well as HIPRTM. Non-crimp carbon textile reinforcements and five-harness satin woven carbon textile reinforcements with a PRISM® EP2400 resin system as base constituents are used to produce composite panels. After manufacturing 16 composite panels, an evaluation of the pros and cons of the processing vs properties/performance obtained with each of them is discussed.

有关复合材料制造技术的大量VARTM选择集可以在文献中以及在工业中找到。每个制造过程都有不同的好处，必须根据所需复合材料的最终用途仔细考虑。在这里，我们将就与纤维体积分数，厚度变化的幅度以及由VARTM（DBVI，VAP和CAPRI）和HIPRTM的不同变体制造的16种层压复合材料的空隙率有关的工艺有效性进行性能比较。以PRISM®EP2400树脂体系为基本成分的非压接碳纤维织物增强材料和五线缎纹碳纤维编织碳纤维增强材料被用于生产复合板。在制造了16块复合板之后，对加工的优缺点进行评估VS与他们每个人的获得性/性能进行了讨论。