当前位置：
X-MOL 学术
›
Nat. Chem.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A review and critique of academic lab safety research.
Nature Chemistry ( IF 19.2 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-18 , DOI: 10.1038/s41557-019-0375-x A Dana Ménard 1 , John F Trant 2
Nature Chemistry ( IF 19.2 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-18 , DOI: 10.1038/s41557-019-0375-x A Dana Ménard 1 , John F Trant 2
Affiliation
|
Over the past ten years, there have been several high-profile accidents in academic laboratories around the world, resulting in significant injuries and fatalities. The aftermath of these incidents is often characterized by calls for reflection and re-examination of the academic discipline's approach to safety research and policy. However, the study of academic lab safety is still underdeveloped and necessary data about changes in safety attitudes and behaviours has not been gathered. This Review article critically examines the state of academic chemical safety research from a multifactorial stance, including research on the occurrence of lab accidents, contributors to lab accidents, the state of safety training research and the cultural barriers to conducting safety research and implementing safer lab practices. The Review concludes by delineating research questions that must be addressed to minimize future serious academic laboratory incidents as well as stressing the need for committed leadership from our research institutions.
中文翻译：
学术实验室安全性研究的回顾和评论。
在过去的十年中，世界各地的学术实验室发生了几起引人注目的事故，造成了严重的伤亡。这些事件的后果通常以要求反思和重新审查该学科的安全研究和政策方法为特征。但是，学术实验室安全性的研究仍不完善，尚未收集到有关安全态度和行为变化的必要数据。这篇综述文章从多方面的角度严格审查了化学安全性研究的现状，包括对实验室事故的发生，实验室事故的成因，安全培训研究的现状以及进行安全研究和实施更安全的实验室实践的文化障碍的研究。 。
更新日期：2019-11-18
中文翻译：
学术实验室安全性研究的回顾和评论。
在过去的十年中，世界各地的学术实验室发生了几起引人注目的事故，造成了严重的伤亡。这些事件的后果通常以要求反思和重新审查该学科的安全研究和政策方法为特征。但是，学术实验室安全性的研究仍不完善，尚未收集到有关安全态度和行为变化的必要数据。这篇综述文章从多方面的角度严格审查了化学安全性研究的现状，包括对实验室事故的发生，实验室事故的成因，安全培训研究的现状以及进行安全研究和实施更安全的实验室实践的文化障碍的研究。 。
京公网安备 11010802027423号