当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Res. Synth. Methods
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Construct validity of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) quality scale for randomized trials: Item response theory and factor analyses.
Research Synthesis Methods ( IF 5.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-05 , DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1385 Emiliano Albanese 1, 2 , Lukas Bütikofer 3, 4 , Susan Armijo-Olivo 5, 6 , Christine Ha 5 , Matthias Egger 3
Research Synthesis Methods ( IF 5.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-05 , DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1385 Emiliano Albanese 1, 2 , Lukas Bütikofer 3, 4 , Susan Armijo-Olivo 5, 6 , Christine Ha 5 , Matthias Egger 3
Affiliation
There is an agreement that the methodological quality of randomized trials should be assessed in systematic reviews, but there is a debate on how this should be done. We conducted a construct validation study of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, which is widely used to assess the quality of trials in physical therapy and rehabilitation.
中文翻译:
构建用于随机试验的物理疗法证据数据库(PEDro)质量量表的有效性:项目反应理论和因素分析。
达成共识,应在系统评价中评估随机试验的方法学质量,但是关于如何进行该方法存在争议。我们进行了物理疗法证据数据库(PEDro)规模的构建验证研究,该研究被广泛用于评估物理疗法和康复试验的质量。
更新日期:2020-01-05
中文翻译:
构建用于随机试验的物理疗法证据数据库(PEDro)质量量表的有效性:项目反应理论和因素分析。
达成共识,应在系统评价中评估随机试验的方法学质量,但是关于如何进行该方法存在争议。我们进行了物理疗法证据数据库(PEDro)规模的构建验证研究,该研究被广泛用于评估物理疗法和康复试验的质量。