当前位置: X-MOL 学术Digest. Endosc. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Utility of EUS and EUS‐FNA for the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic lesions: Differences between the guidelines
Digestive Endoscopy ( IF 5.0 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-27 , DOI: 10.1111/den.13579
Takuji Iwashita 1 , Shinya Uemura 1 , Naoki Mita 1 , Yuhei Iwasa 1 , Hironao Ichikawa 1 , Akihiko Senju 1 , Ichiro Yasuda 2 , Masahito Shimizu 1
Affiliation  

Recent advancement and frequent usage of cross-sectional imaging studies have increased opportunities for incidental diagnoses of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). In the management of PCLs, distinguishing between mucinous versus non-mucinous and malignant versus benign cysts is important to diagnose pancreatic cancer in its early stage. Because of that, there have been several guidelines to manage PCLs. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) play important roles in the guidelines, although there are some differences in its role between the guidelines. In this review, we aimed to evaluate the current status of EUS and EUS-FNA in the management of PCLs and the position of these procedures in the guidelines.

中文翻译:

EUS 和 EUS-FNA 在胰腺囊性病变诊断和管理中的应用:指南之间的差异

最近的进步和横断面成像研究的频繁使用增加了偶然诊断胰腺囊性病变 (PCL) 的机会。在 PCL 的管理中,区分粘液性与非粘液性以及恶性与良性囊肿对于早期诊断胰腺癌很重要。正因为如此,有几个指导方针来管理 PCL。内窥镜超声 (EUS) 和 EUS 引导的细针穿刺 (FNA) 在指南中发挥着重要作用,尽管指南之间的作用存在一些差异。在本次审查中,我们旨在评估 EUS 和 EUS-FNA 在 PCL 管理中的现状以及这些程序在指南中的位置。
更新日期:2019-12-27
down
wechat
bug