Approach motivation and avoidance motivation are basic fundamental forms of energization and direction; both are crucial for describing and explaining affect, cognition, and behavior. Scholer, Cornwell, and Higgins (in press) define approach motivation as “eagerly focusing on where one wants to go, striving for desired end-states” and avoidance motivation as “vigilantly focusing on what one wants to get away from, striving to move away from undesired end-states” (p. 111). Scholer et al. note that approach motivation is commonly viewed as better than avoidance motivation in most instances, and they use a hierarchical perspective to encourage reconsideration of this premise. As would be expected from these authors, the article is clearly written, cogently argued, and deeply insightful. In the main, we concur with the message that is espoused, as well as the specific supportive arguments. Herein we simply offer two points intended to supplement this welcome addition to the literature.

中文翻译：

---

趋近和回避动机的功能和层次组合

接近动机和回避动机是激励和方向的基本基本形式；两者对于描述和解释情感、认知和行为都至关重要。Scholer、Cornwell 和 Higgins（正在出版中）将接近动机定义为“急切地关注一个人想去的地方，为理想的最终状态而努力”，而回避动机则定义为“警惕地关注一个人想要摆脱的东西，努力移动远离不想要的最终状态”（第 111 页）。斯科勒等人。请注意，在大多数情况下，接近动机通常被视为比回避动机更好，并且他们使用分层视角来鼓励重新考虑这一前提。正如这些作者所期望的那样，这篇文章写得很清楚，论据有说服力，并且有深刻的洞察力。总的来说，我们同意所支持的信息，以及具体的支持论据。在此，我们仅提供两点，旨在补充这一受欢迎的文献补充。