In Reply In their Letter, Leas et al, who, to our knowledge, published the first study on possible effects of 13 Reasons Why on suicide-related internet search behavior,¹ point out the necessity to use new methodological approaches to improve public health surveillance and responses to emerging public health threats such as 13 Reasons Why. We wholeheartedly agree with the scientific points made in their Letter, although we are a bit puzzled that our reference to their work, including highlighting it in our discussion, however briefly, was viewed as a dismissal of their contribution to evidence on the impact of 13 Reasons Why.

中文翻译：

---

忽略数据会延迟我们对新出现的公共卫生悲剧的反应，例如13个理由-回复

在我们的知识中，Leas等人在回信中发表了第一篇关于13种原因对自杀相关的互联网搜索行为可能产生影响的研究的研究报告，¹指出了使用新的方法论方法来改善公共卫生监测的必要性以及对新兴的公共卫生威胁的应对，例如13个原因。我们完全同意他们在信中提出的科学观点，尽管我们对此感到有些困惑，但是我们对他们的工作的提及，包括在我们的讨论中强调它，无论是多么简短，都被认为是驳斥了他们对证据对13影响的贡献。原因。