To the Editor We applaud Niederkrotenthaler and colleagues¹ for adding another layer of evidence that 13 Reasons Why is harming the public by pushing some individuals toward suicide. However, their dismissal of some of the earliest evidence on this subject deserves a revision not because it undermines their central claim but because it makes it even stronger and can make psychiatric epidemiology more actionable in the future.

中文翻译：

---

忽略数据会延迟我们对新出现的公共卫生悲剧的反应，例如13个原因

致编辑我们称赞Niederkrotenthaler及其同事¹补充了另一层证据，证明了促使某些人自杀的13种伤害公众的原因。但是，他们驳回有关该主题的某些最早证据的做法值得修改，不是因为它破坏了他们的核心主张，而是因为它使这一主张更加强大，并且可以使精神病学流行病学在将来更具可操作性。