当前位置: X-MOL 学术Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Partial information and complex development decisions: Illustrations from infrastructure projects
Environmental Impact Assessment Review ( IF 9.8 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106281
Shanaka Kariyawasam , Mark McGovern , Clevo Wilson

Abstract This study assesses the theoretical and practical limitations of evaluations of infrastructure projects. Existing tools used in such evaluations typically exhibit two main limitations. Firstly, they tend to accommodate only two dimensions at once and rely on extensive use of averages for additional dimensions. Secondly, they mostly produce a narrow (project exclusive) or information that is too general, thereby precluding both broader and more detailed interpretations at once. Development decisions so informed are consequently based on partial information. Too often this has produced unsatisfactory outcomes for some stakeholders along with increased risks and heightened uncertainties. This is particularly the case for infrastructure projects. This paper proposes an alternative approach to development decision-making called ‘complex stakeholder perception mapping’ (CSPM). CSPM's evaluations inclusively involve a spectrum of insights and perception maps which offer flexibility, combined with complex perceptions of multiple stakeholders on multiple aspects of development. Applicability of CSPM is demonstrated using four perceptual dimensions in infrastructure development evaluation. Different perception combinations and individual group perceptions generate patterns which indicate aspects and groups that need attention. This approach generates rigorous interpretations of information at both the micro and macro level of the project environment, thereby supporting well-informed strategic decision making to advance project outcomes.

中文翻译:

部分信息和复杂的开发决策:来自基础设施项目的说明

摘要 本研究评估了基础设施项目评估的理论和实践局限性。用于此类评估的现有工具通常表现出两个主要限制。首先,它们往往一次只适应两个维度,并且依赖于对附加维度的平均值的广泛使用。其次,它们大多产生狭隘的(项目专有的)或过于笼统的信息,从而同时排除了更广泛和更详细的解释。因此,如此知情的开发决策是基于部分信息的。这常常给一些利益相关者带来不令人满意的结果,同时增加了风险和不确定性。基础设施项目尤其如此。本文提出了一种称为“复杂利益相关者感知映射”(CSPM) 的开发决策替代方法。CSPM 的评估包含一系列洞察力和感知图,提供灵活性,并结合多个利益相关者对发展的多个方面的复杂感知。在基础设施开发评估中使用四个感知维度证明了 CSPM 的适用性。不同的感知组合和个体群体感知会产生模式,表明需要注意的方面和群体。这种方法在项目环境的微观和宏观层面产生对信息的严格解释,从而支持明智的战略决策,以推进项目成果。s 评估包含一系列洞察力和感知图,提供灵活性,并结合多个利益相关者对发展的多个方面的复杂感知。在基础设施开发评估中使用四个感知维度证明了 CSPM 的适用性。不同的感知组合和个体群体感知会产生模式,表明需要注意的方面和群体。这种方法在项目环境的微观和宏观层面产生对信息的严格解释,从而支持明智的战略决策,以推进项目成果。s 评估包含一系列洞察力和感知图,提供灵活性,并结合多个利益相关者对发展的多个方面的复杂感知。在基础设施开发评估中使用四个感知维度证明了 CSPM 的适用性。不同的感知组合和个体群体感知会产生模式,表明需要注意的方面和群体。这种方法在项目环境的微观和宏观层面产生对信息的严格解释,从而支持明智的战略决策,以推进项目成果。在基础设施开发评估中使用四个感知维度证明了 CSPM 的适用性。不同的感知组合和个体群体感知会产生模式,表明需要注意的方面和群体。这种方法在项目环境的微观和宏观层面产生对信息的严格解释,从而支持明智的战略决策,以推进项目成果。在基础设施开发评估中使用四个感知维度证明了 CSPM 的适用性。不同的感知组合和个体群体感知会产生模式,表明需要注意的方面和群体。这种方法在项目环境的微观和宏观层面产生对信息的严格解释,从而支持明智的战略决策,以推进项目成果。
更新日期:2019-09-01
down
wechat
bug