Despite psychological scientists' increasing interest in replicability, open science, research transparency, and the improvement of methods and practices, the clinical psychology community has been slow to engage. This has been shifting more recently, and with this review, we hope to facilitate this emerging dialogue. We begin by examining some potential areas of weakness in clinical psychology in terms of methods, practices, and evidentiary base. We then discuss a select overview of solutions, tools, and current concerns of the reform movement from a clinical psychological science perspective. We examine areas of clinical science expertise (e.g., implementation science) that should be leveraged to inform open science and reform efforts. Finally, we reiterate the call to clinical psychologists to increase their efforts toward reform that can further improve the credibility of clinical psychological science.

中文翻译：

---

心理学的复制危机与临床心理学。

尽管心理学家对可复制性，开放科学，研究透明性以及方法和实践的改进越来越感兴趣，但临床心理学界的参与度仍然很慢。这是最近发生的变化，通过这次审查，我们希望能够促进这种新出现的对话。我们首先从方法，实践和证据基础方面研究临床心理学中一些潜在的弱点领域。然后，我们将从临床心理学的角度讨论改革运动的解决方案，工具和当前关注的部分问题。我们研究了临床科学专业知识（例如实施科学）领域，应该利用这些领域为开放科学和改革工作提供信息。最后，