This document review investigated policies that govern Batterer Intervention Programs (BIPs) across the United States. The document review systematically analyzed current state practice standards ( = 46) across the United States that guide BIPs. Data collection and abstraction took place between June of 2019 and January of 2020. Descriptive statistics were calculated for standard development and revision processes, BIP oversight, and requirements for program structure and curriculum. This review revealed key findings about standard requirements, including: (a) most do not cite research as having informed their development; (b) most have been revised in the past decade; (c) state agencies involved in BIP oversight are typically social or health agencies or a judicial board; (d) most require BIPs to provide intakes, group education, gender-exclusive groups, two facilitators and to cover a variety of topics; (e) most do not require individualized treatment or program evaluation. Additional findings around program structure, intake and assessment, and curriculum and intervention requirements are explored. Collectively, standards not changed much in the last decade and often standards do not reflect the latest research on IPV perpetration. Multidisciplinary teams, including researchers familiar with the IPV literature, should work collaboratively to revise standards based on best practices.

中文翻译：

---

美国施暴者干预计划国家实践标准的文件审查

本文件审查调查了美国各地管理施虐者干预计划 (BIP) 的政策。文件审查系统地分析了美国各地指导 BIP 的现行州实践标准 (= 46)。数据收集和提取发生在 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 1 月之间。计算了标准制定和修订流程、BIP 监督以及项目结构和课程要求的描述性统计数据。这次审查揭示了有关标准要求的主要发现，包括： (a) 大多数人没有引用研究来指导其发展； (b) 大多数内容在过去十年中已得到修订； (c) 参与 BIP 监督的国家机构通常是社会或卫生机构或司法委员会； (d) 大多数要求 BIP 提供入学、团体教育、不分性别的团体、两名协调员并涵盖各种主题； (e) 大多数不需要个体化治疗或项目评估。探讨了有关项目结构、入学和评估以及课程和干预要求的其他发现。总的来说，标准在过去十年中没有太大变化，而且标准通常没有反映 IPV 攻击的最新研究。多学科团队，包括熟悉 IPV 文献的研究人员，应协作根据最佳实践修订标准。