Preliminary research has demonstrated that not all assessment center (AC) exercises are viewed as equally just or motivating. The current research builds upon this research and investigates the relationships between six AC exercises and perceptions of self-efficacy, motivation, assessor bias, and fairness. Using a 2 × 2 × 2 experimental design (two informational justice interventions and one rating timing intervention), 286 working adults completed a survey designed to investigate differences between AC exercises and to investigate interventions designed to influence AC exercise perceptions. The results show not only significant perceptual differences between assessor-rated exercises and an ability test but also differences among the rated exercises. The results suggest that an ability test can be perceived as both among the most just and motivating exercises. Lastly, even though the experimental interventions did not have their anticipated effects, the results suggest benefits to having assessors rate recorded participant behaviors versus rating “live” behaviors, benefits that to a certain extent depend on whether participants had previously attended an assessment center.

中文翻译：

---

对评估中心练习的看法：练习差异和干预措施之间

初步研究表明，并非所有评估中心 (AC) 的活动都被视为同样公正或具有激励性。当前的研究建立在这项研究的基础上，调查了六种 AC 练习与自我效能感、动机、评估者偏见和公平感之间的关系。采用 2 × 2 × 2 实验设计（两项信息正义干预措施和一项评级计时干预措施），286 名工作成年人完成了一项调查，旨在调查 AC 锻炼之间的差异，并调查旨在影响 AC 锻炼认知的干预措施。结果不仅显示了评估者评分的练习和能力测试之间存在显着的感知差异，而且还显示了评分练习之间的差异。结果表明，能力测试可以被视为最公正和最具激励性的练习之一。最后，尽管实验干预措施没有达到预期的效果，但结果表明，与评估“实时”行为相比，让评估者对记录的参与者行为进行评分会带来好处，这种好处在一定程度上取决于参与者之前是否参加过评估中心。