Research showing the relationship between exposure to green space and health has yielded conflicting results, possibly due to the oversight of green space quality in quantitative studies. This systematic review, guided by the PRISMA framework (registered under Prospero ID CRD42023279720), focused on audit tools for green space quality in mental health research. From 4028 studies, 13 were reviewed, with 77 % linking better mental health outcomes to higher green space quality. Eight tools, especially Public Open Space and Dillen et al. tools demonstrated strong correlations with mental health. Certain green space qualities like grass, pathways, and water elements showed positive health associations. Future research should aim for standardized quality metrics and robust methodologies to support causal inferences and efficient assessments.

中文翻译：

---

对评估心理健康研究中绿色空间质量的审计工具进行系统审查

研究表明，接触绿色空间与健康之间的关系产生了相互矛盾的结果，这可能是由于定量研究中对绿色空间质量的监督造成的。这项系统审查以 PRISMA 框架（在 Prospero ID CRD42023279720 下注册）为指导，重点关注心理健康研究中绿色空间质量的审计工具。对 4028 项研究中的 13 项进行了审查，其中 77% 将更好的心理健康结果与更高的绿色空间质量联系起来。八个工具，特别是公共开放空间和 Dillen 等人。工具与心理健康有很强的相关性。某些绿色空间品质，如草地、道路和水元素，显示出积极的健康关联。未来的研究应该致力于标准化的质量指标和强大的方法论，以支持因果推断和有效的评估。