Intentional actions produce a temporal compression between the action and its outcome, known as intentional binding. However, Suzuki et al. (2019) recently showed that temporal compression can be observed without intentional actions. However, their results show a clear regression to the mean, which might have confounded the estimates of temporal intervals. To control these effects, we presented temporal intervals block-wise. Indeed, we found systematically greater compression for active than passive trials, in contrast to Suzuki et al. (2019). In our second experiment, our goal was to conceptually replicate the previous study. However, we were unable to reproduce their results and instead found more pronounced temporal compression in active trials compared to passive ones. In a subsequent attempt at a direct replication, we did not observe the same findings as the original study. Our findings reinforce the theory that intentions rather than causality cause temporal binding.

中文翻译：

---

故意绑定——这只是因果绑定吗？铃木等人的复制研究。 (2019)

有意行为会在行为与其结果之间产生时间压缩，称为有意绑定。然而，铃木等人。 （2019）最近表明，无需有意行为即可观察到时间压缩。然而，他们的结果显示出明显的均值回归，这可能会混淆时间间隔的估计。为了控制这些影响，我们按块呈现时间间隔。事实上，与铃木等人相比，我们发现主动试验的压缩系统性比被动试验更大。 （2019）。在我们的第二个实验中，我们的目标是在概念上复制之前的研究。然而，我们无法重现他们的结果，而是发现主动试验中的时间压缩比被动试验更明显。在随后的直接复制尝试中，我们没有观察到与原始研究相同的结果。我们的研究结果强化了这样的理论：意图而不是因果关系导致时间绑定。