This analysis investigates whether solidarity is an appropriate concept for thinking about justifications for a just distribution of bioethical goods in the international arena. This will be explored by looking at the national origins of the idea of justifying solidarity in the form of the health care that welfare states offer. Following that, ‘life’ and ‘health’ will be placed within a philosophical context by focusing on the main arguments of John Rawls and Amartya Sen and the role of solidarity in these two theories of justice will be analysed. It will be shown that these theories assume that solidarity is not a prerequisite for just international structures. Finally, the possibility will be discussed, that there is a degree of uncertainty surrounding justifications for fair distribution in the international context that can result when the concepts of solidarity and justice are handled imprecisely.

中文翻译：

---

团结概念对于国际地区生物伦理产品公平分配的作用

本分析调查了团结是否是一个适当的概念，用于思考在国际舞台上公平分配生物伦理产品的理由。我们将通过考察以福利国家提供的医疗保健的形式证明团结的理念的民族起源来探讨这一点。接下来，“生命”和“健康”将被置于哲学语境中，重点关注约翰·罗尔斯和阿马蒂亚·森的主要论点，并分析团结在这两种正义理论中的作用。将会表明，这些理论假设团结并不是公正的国际结构的先决条件。最后，我们将讨论这样一种可能性：当团结和正义的概念处理不准确时，国际背景下公平分配的理由可能会存在一定程度的不确定性。